ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Evaluating a New Photopheresis System: A Comparison with Two Established Systems on Cell Yield and Collection Efficiency.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Mononuclear Cell Collection Efficiency for CAR-T Manufacturing.Current medical science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
methodsThis retrospective study compared 127 procedures utilizing the Spectra Optia offline system, 93 procedures employing the Amicus Blue inline system, and 81 procedures applying the Therakos Cellex inline system. The MNCs were subjected to flow cytometry analysis for CD45 and CD14 expression in order to ascertain the precise composition of the collected lymphocyte and monocyte fractions.
resultsThe Therakos inline system demonstrated the highest MNC collection efficiency (Therakos: 74.42 ± 1.82; Optia: 65.79 ± 1.48; Amicus: 56.32 ± 2.80;
conclusionsThis study represents the first direct comparison of the new Amicus Blue inline system with the two most commonly used ECP systems in the same patient cohort of a single center. The data show that the Amicus Blue inline system collects sufficient MNCs to perform an ECP, but it has a significantly lower CE than the other systems and a significantly lower amount of collected MNCs than the Spectra Optia offline system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.