ArticleCurrent issues in molecular biology2024
Comparative Molecular Docking of Apigenin and Luteolin versus Conventional Ligands for TP-53, pRb, APOBEC3H, and HPV-16 E6: Potential Clinical Applications in Preventing Gynecological Malignancies.
Article in Current issues in molecular biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Plant Bioactive Constituents and Their Potential Benefits in HPV-Positive Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma-A Narrative Review.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Review
- Computational and Cytotoxicity Evaluation of Phyllanthus Urinaria-Derived Compounds as Potential Anti-Cervical Cancer Agents via HPV-16 E6 Oncoprotein Inhibition.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Exploring the Potential of a Novel Oil Blend Therapy for Immunity Enhancement and Cervical Carcinoma Treatment.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2025Article
- Therapeutic potential of flavonoids from traditional Chinese medicine in pancreatic cancer treatment.Frontiers in nutrition · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study presents a comparative analysis of molecular docking data, focusing on the binding interactions of the natural compounds apigenin and luteolin with the proteins TP-53, pRb, and APOBEC, in comparison to conventional pharmacological ligands. Advanced bioinformatics techniques were employed to evaluate and contrast binding energies, showing that apigenin and luteolin demonstrate significantly higher affinities for TP-53, pRb, and APOBEC, with binding energies of -6.9 kcal/mol and -6.6 kcal/mol, respectively. These values suggest strong potential for therapeutic intervention against HPV-16. Conventional ligands, by comparison, exhibited lower affinities, with energies ranging from -4.5 to -5.5 kcal/mol. Additionally, protein-protein docking simulations were performed to assess the interaction between HPV-16 E6 oncoprotein and tumor suppressors TP-53 and pRb, which revealed high binding energies around -976.7 kcal/mol, indicative of their complex interaction. A conversion formula was applied to translate these protein-protein interaction energies to a comparable scale for non-protein interactions, further underscoring the superior binding potential of apigenin and luteolin. These findings highlight the therapeutic promise of these natural compounds in preventing HPV-16-induced oncogenesis, warranting further experimental validation for clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.