ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2024
GLP-1 RA Prescribing Errors in a Multidisciplinary Digital Weight-Loss Service: A Retrospective Quantitative Analysis.
Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Digital engagement enhances dual GIP/GLP-1 receptor agonist and GLP-1 receptor agonist efficacy: A retrospective cohort analysis of a digital weight loss service on outcomes and safety.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2026Article
- Article
- The Role of Pharmacists in Minimizing the Risk Inherent in Unbundled Telehealth Services: A 12-Month Retrospective Case Study.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDigital weight loss services (DWLSs) that use Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) have demonstrated potential in contributing to a shift in global obesity rates. However, reasonable concerns have been raised about the prescribing safety of these services. Prior to this study, electronic prescribing safety had only been investigated in hospital settings and community clinics.
methodsThis study retrospectively analyzed prescribing errors committed over a 6-month period in 2023 at Australia's largest GLP-1 RA-supported DWLS.
resultsThe analysis found that 1654 (4.4%) of the 37323 audited GLP-1 RA prescriptions contained an error. Most errors pertained to insufficient safety counselling (49.15%) and inadequate investigations of potential contraindications (30.29%). Although a large portion of prescribing errors were detected via the automated query method (64.9%), the other three auditing methods all detected a significant number of true errors (>100). Patients from the highest body mass index category (40+ kg/m
conclusionsThese findings lay a vital foundation in the emerging literature on GLP-1 RA-supported DWLSs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.