Separating Risk Prediction: Myocardial Infarction vs. Ischemic Stroke in 6.2M Screenings.

backgroundTraditional cardiovascular disease risk prediction models generate a combined risk assessment for myocardial infarction (MI) and ischemic stroke (IS), which may inadequately reflect the distinct etiologies and disparate risk factors of MI and IS. We aim to develop prediction models that separately estimate the risks of MI and IS.

methodsOur analysis included 6,242,404 individuals over 40 years old who participated in a cardiovascular health screening examination in 2009. Potential predictors were selected based on a literature review and the available data. Cox proportional hazards models were used to construct 5-year risk prediction models for MI, and IS. Model performance was assessed through discrimination and calibration.

resultsDuring a follow-up of 39,322,434.39 person-years, 89,140 individuals were diagnosed with MI and 116,259 with IS. Both models included age, sex, body mass index, smoking, alcohol consumption, physical activity, diabetes, hypertension, dyslipidemia, chronic kidney disease, and family history. Statin use was factored into the classification of dyslipidemia. The c-indices for the prediction models were 0.709 (0.707-0.712) for MI, and 0.770 (0.768-0.772) for IS. Age and hypertension exhibited a more pronounced effect on IS risk prediction than MI, whereas smoking, body mass index, dyslipidemia, and chronic kidney disease showed the opposite effect. The models calibrated well for low-risk individuals.

conclusionsOur findings underscore the necessity of tailored risk assessments for MI and IS to facilitate the early detection and accurate identification of heterogeneous at-risk populations for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease.