Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39451461›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Restorative Just Culture: An Exploration of the Enabling Conditions for Successful Implementation.

Leonie Boskeljon-Horst, Vincent Steinmetz, Sidney Dekker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Leonie Boskeljon-HorstNetherlands Defence Academy, Isaac Delprat Paviljoen, Hogeschoollaan 2, 4818 BB Breda, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5760-6191
Vincent SteinmetzVoqx-Innovative Safety, Willem van Oranjelaan 21, 1412 GJ Naarden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4394-2471
Sidney DekkerSafety Science Innovation Lab, School of Humanities, Languages and Social Science, Griffith University, 170 Kessels Road, Nathan Campus, Nathan, QLD 4111, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9141-3374

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesRestorative responses to staff involved in incidents are becoming recognized as a rigorous and constructive alternative to retributive forms of 'just culture'. However, actually achieving restoration in mostly retributive working environments can be quite difficult. The conditions for the fair and successful application of restorative practices have not yet been established. In this article, we explore possible commonalities in the conditions for success across multiple cases and industries.

methodsIn an exploratory review we analysed published and unpublished cases to discover enabling conditions.

resultsWe found eight enabling conditions-leadership response, leadership expectations, perspective of leadership, 'tough on content, soft on relationships', public and media attention, regulatory or judicial attention to the incident, second victim acknowledgement, and possible full-disclosure setting-whose absence or presence either hampered or fostered a restorative response.

conclusionsThe enabling conditions seemed to coagulate around leadership qualities, media and judicial attention resulting in leadership apprehension or unease linked to their political room for maneuver in the wake of an incident, and the engagement of the 'second victim'. These three categories can possibly form a frame within which the application of restorative justice can have a sustainable effect. Follow-up research is needed to test this hypothesis.

Indexed as

enabling conditionsleadership qualitiesrestorative just culturesecond victim engagement

Identifiers

PMID39451461
PMCPMC11507443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.