Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39451418›Full record

ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2024

GPT-Driven Radiology Report Generation with Fine-Tuned Llama 3.

Ștefan-Vlad Voinea, Mădălin Mămuleanu, Rossy Vlăduț Teică, Lucian Mihai Florescu, Dan Selișteanu, Ioana Andreea Gheonea

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ștefan-Vlad VoineaDepartment of Automatic Control and Electronics, University of Craiova, 200585 Craiova, Romania.
Mădălin MămuleanuDepartment of Automatic Control and Electronics, University of Craiova, 200585 Craiova, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-1524-2494
Rossy Vlăduț TeicăDoctoral School, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania.ORCID 0009-0004-9147-7951
Lucian Mihai FlorescuDepartment of Radiology and Medical Imaging, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania.
Dan SelișteanuDepartment of Automatic Control and Electronics, University of Craiova, 200585 Craiova, Romania.ORCID 0000-0002-9770-405X
Ioana Andreea GheoneaDepartment of Radiology and Medical Imaging, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania.ORCID 0009-0000-0954-1266

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The integration of deep learning into radiology has the potential to enhance diagnostic processes, yet its acceptance in clinical practice remains limited due to various challenges. This study aimed to develop and evaluate a fine-tuned large language model (LLM), based on Llama 3-8B, to automate the generation of accurate and concise conclusions in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) radiology reports, thereby assisting radiologists and improving reporting efficiency. A dataset comprising 15,000 radiology reports was collected from the University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova's Imaging Center, covering a diverse range of MRI and CT examinations made by four experienced radiologists. The Llama 3-8B model was fine-tuned using transfer-learning techniques, incorporating parameter quantization to 4-bit precision and low-rank adaptation (LoRA) with a rank of 16 to optimize computational efficiency on consumer-grade GPUs. The model was trained over five epochs using an NVIDIA RTX 3090 GPU, with intermediary checkpoints saved for monitoring. Performance was evaluated quantitatively using Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers Score (BERTScore), Recall-Oriented Understudy for Gisting Evaluation (ROUGE), Bilingual Evaluation Understudy (BLEU), and Metric for Evaluation of Translation with Explicit Ordering (METEOR) metrics on a held-out test set. Additionally, a qualitative assessment was conducted, involving 13 independent radiologists who participated in a Turing-like test and provided ratings for the AI-generated conclusions. The fine-tuned model demonstrated strong quantitative performance, achieving a BERTScore F1 of 0.8054, a ROUGE-1 F1 of 0.4998, a ROUGE-L F1 of 0.4628, and a METEOR score of 0.4282. In the human evaluation, the artificial intelligence (AI)-generated conclusions were preferred over human-written ones in approximately 21.8% of cases, indicating that the model's outputs were competitive with those of experienced radiologists. The average rating of the AI-generated conclusions was 3.65 out of 5, reflecting a generally favorable assessment. Notably, the model maintained its consistency across various types of reports and demonstrated the ability to generalize to unseen data. The fine-tuned Llama 3-8B model effectively generates accurate and coherent conclusions for MRI and CT radiology reports. By automating the conclusion-writing process, this approach can assist radiologists in reducing their workload and enhancing report consistency, potentially addressing some barriers to the adoption of deep learning in clinical practice. The positive evaluations from independent radiologists underscore the model's potential utility. While the model demonstrated strong performance, limitations such as dataset bias, limited sample diversity, a lack of clinical judgment, and the need for large computational resources require further refinement and real-world validation. Future work should explore the integration of such models into clinical workflows, address ethical and legal considerations, and extend this approach to generate complete radiology reports.

Indexed as

AI in healthcareautomated report generationconvolutional neural networksCT scansdeep learningdiagnostic imaginglarge language modelsLlama 3MRI reportsradiology

Identifiers

PMID39451418
PMCPMC11504957

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.