ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2024
GPT-Driven Radiology Report Generation with Fine-Tuned Llama 3.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Effectiveness, Safety, and Workflow Burden of Large Language Model-Based Medical Report Generation: Systematic Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- The performance of large language models in dentomaxillofacial radiology: a systematic review.Dento maxillo facial radiology · 2025Pooled it
- Fine-tuned multimodal GPT-4o for generating diagnostic impressions in breast magnetic resonance imaging: insights into non-mass enhancement lesions.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Evaluation of Context-Aware Prompting Techniques for Classification of Tumor Response Categories in Radiology Reports Using Large Language Model.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Letter to Editor: Pushing large language models for improved radiomics study and research.European radiology · 2026Article
- Intelligence Architectures and Machine Learning Applications in Contemporary Spine Care.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Advancements in Radiology Report Generation: A Comprehensive Analysis.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The integration of deep learning into radiology has the potential to enhance diagnostic processes, yet its acceptance in clinical practice remains limited due to various challenges. This study aimed to develop and evaluate a fine-tuned large language model (LLM), based on Llama 3-8B, to automate the generation of accurate and concise conclusions in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) radiology reports, thereby assisting radiologists and improving reporting efficiency. A dataset comprising 15,000 radiology reports was collected from the University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova's Imaging Center, covering a diverse range of MRI and CT examinations made by four experienced radiologists. The Llama 3-8B model was fine-tuned using transfer-learning techniques, incorporating parameter quantization to 4-bit precision and low-rank adaptation (LoRA) with a rank of 16 to optimize computational efficiency on consumer-grade GPUs. The model was trained over five epochs using an NVIDIA RTX 3090 GPU, with intermediary checkpoints saved for monitoring. Performance was evaluated quantitatively using Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers Score (BERTScore), Recall-Oriented Understudy for Gisting Evaluation (ROUGE), Bilingual Evaluation Understudy (BLEU), and Metric for Evaluation of Translation with Explicit Ordering (METEOR) metrics on a held-out test set. Additionally, a qualitative assessment was conducted, involving 13 independent radiologists who participated in a Turing-like test and provided ratings for the AI-generated conclusions. The fine-tuned model demonstrated strong quantitative performance, achieving a BERTScore F1 of 0.8054, a ROUGE-1 F1 of 0.4998, a ROUGE-L F1 of 0.4628, and a METEOR score of 0.4282. In the human evaluation, the artificial intelligence (AI)-generated conclusions were preferred over human-written ones in approximately 21.8% of cases, indicating that the model's outputs were competitive with those of experienced radiologists. The average rating of the AI-generated conclusions was 3.65 out of 5, reflecting a generally favorable assessment. Notably, the model maintained its consistency across various types of reports and demonstrated the ability to generalize to unseen data. The fine-tuned Llama 3-8B model effectively generates accurate and coherent conclusions for MRI and CT radiology reports. By automating the conclusion-writing process, this approach can assist radiologists in reducing their workload and enhancing report consistency, potentially addressing some barriers to the adoption of deep learning in clinical practice. The positive evaluations from independent radiologists underscore the model's potential utility. While the model demonstrated strong performance, limitations such as dataset bias, limited sample diversity, a lack of clinical judgment, and the need for large computational resources require further refinement and real-world validation. Future work should explore the integration of such models into clinical workflows, address ethical and legal considerations, and extend this approach to generate complete radiology reports.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.