ArticleBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2024
Older Adult Fall Risk Prediction with Deep Learning and Timed Up and Go (TUG) Test Data.
Article in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Accuracy of wearable devices in predicting falls in older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2026Pooled it
- Interpretable and explainable artificial intelligence for wearable sensor-based fall risk assessment in older adults: a systematic review with considerations for prosthetics and orthotics.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2026Pooled it
- Explainable AI reveals temporal risk pathways in fall prediction: Extracting clinical insights from multi-horizon machine learning models.GeroScience · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence for detecting fall events, assessing fall risks, and preventing fall occurrences in the elderly: A narrative review.Clinical medicine (London, England) · 2026Review
- Evaluation of the Importance of Stopping Elderly Accidents, Deaths, and Injuries (STEADI)-Based Factors in Wearable Fall Risk Assessment: Secondary Data Analysis.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2026Article
- MadgwickFall-Net: A Lightweight Dual-Frame Feature Fusion Network for Pre-Impact Fall Detection Using Wearable IMUs.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Predicting fall risk among older adults with sarcopenia in China using machine learning models: a six-year longitudinal study from CHARLS.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- Fall detection and pre-impact prediction technologies in older adults: a scoping review of translational maturity and public health integration.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Kinematic Biomarkers of Functional Disability in Older Adults: Analysis of the Timed Up and Go Test.Biosensors · 2025Article
- Instrumented Functional Mobility Assessment in Elderly Patients Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Longitudinal Study Using the Timed Up and Go Test.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Balance and fall-risk assessment in older adults using wearable plantar pressure and semi-supervised learning.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Falls are a major health hazard for older adults; therefore, in the context of an aging population, predicting the risk of a patient suffering falls in the near future is of great impact for health care systems. Currently, the standard prospective fall risk assessment instrument relies on a set of clinical and functional mobility assessment tools, one of them being the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test. Recently, wearable inertial measurement units (IMUs) have been proposed to capture motion data that would allow for the building of estimates of fall risk. The hypothesis of this study is that the data gathered from IMU readings while the patient is performing the TUG test can be used to build a predictive model that would provide an estimate of the probability of suffering a fall in the near future, i.e., assessing prospective fall risk. This study applies deep learning convolutional neural networks (CNN) and recurrent neural networks (RNN) to build such predictive models based on features extracted from IMU data acquired during TUG test realizations. Data were obtained from a cohort of 106 older adults wearing wireless IMU sensors with sampling frequencies of 100 Hz while performing the TUG test. The dependent variable is a binary variable that is true if the patient suffered a fall in the six-month follow-up period. This variable was used as the output variable for the supervised training and validations of the deep learning architectures and competing machine learning approaches. A hold-out validation process using 75 subjects for training and 31 subjects for testing was repeated one hundred times to obtain robust estimations of model performances At each repetition, 5-fold cross-validation was carried out to select the best model over the training subset. Best results were achieved by a bidirectional long short-term memory (BLSTM), obtaining an accuracy of 0.83 and AUC of 0.73 with good sensitivity and specificity values.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.