Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39451360›Full record

ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Building an Ethical and Trustworthy Biomedical AI Ecosystem for the Translational and Clinical Integration of Foundation Models.

Baradwaj Simha Sankar, Destiny Gilliland, Jack Rincon, Henning Hermjakob, Yu Yan, Irsyad Adam, Gwyneth Lemaster, Dean Wang, Karol Watson, Alex Bui and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. The Common Fund Data Ecosystem (CFDE).bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Baradwaj Simha SankarDepartment of Physiology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Destiny GillilandDepartment of Physiology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.ORCID 0009-0000-1275-8810
Jack RinconDepartment of Physiology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Henning HermjakobEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Cambridge CB10 1SD, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8479-0262
Yu YanDepartment of Physiology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1222-1033
Irsyad AdamDepartment of Physiology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.ORCID 0009-0000-2288-401X
Gwyneth LemasterDepartment of Physiology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Dean WangDepartment of Physiology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8236-8551
Karol WatsonDepartment of Medicine, Cardiology Division, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Alex BuiMedical Informatics Home Area, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4702-1373
Wei WangMedical Informatics Home Area, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8180-2886
Peipei PingDepartment of Physiology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3583-3881

Funding

Tool Core- BoutrosU54HG012517 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI BOUTROS, PAUL CHRISTOPHER · 2022 to 2025
$10.6M
CONNECT: Collaborative Network for Nurturing Ecosystems of Common Fund Team ScienceU54OD036472 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI Peipei Ping · 2024 to 2026
$7.3M
NHGRI NIH HHS U54 HG012517NIH HHS U54HG012517NIH HHS U54 OD036472NIH HHS U54OD036472
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Foundation Models (FMs) are gaining increasing attention in the biomedical artificial intelligence (AI) ecosystem due to their ability to represent and contextualize multimodal biomedical data. These capabilities make FMs a valuable tool for a variety of tasks, including biomedical reasoning, hypothesis generation, and interpreting complex imaging data. In this review paper, we address the unique challenges associated with establishing an ethical and trustworthy biomedical AI ecosystem, with a particular focus on the development of FMs and their downstream applications. We explore strategies that can be implemented throughout the biomedical AI pipeline to effectively tackle these challenges, ensuring that these FMs are translated responsibly into clinical and translational settings. Additionally, we emphasize the importance of key stewardship and co-design principles that not only ensure robust regulation but also guarantee that the interests of all stakeholders-especially those involved in or affected by these clinical and translational applications-are adequately represented. We aim to empower the biomedical AI community to harness these models responsibly and effectively. As we navigate this exciting frontier, our collective commitment to ethical stewardship, co-design, and responsible translation will be instrumental in ensuring that the evolution of FMs truly enhances patient care and medical decision-making, ultimately leading to a more equitable and trustworthy biomedical AI ecosystem.

Indexed as

AI ecosystemAI governance and regulationAI lifecylebiomedical AIclinical integrationethical AIFoundation Modelsstakeholder engagementtrustworthy AI

Identifiers

PMID39451360
PMCPMC11504392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.