Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39451345›Full record

ReviewBioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Scaffolds for Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Last Ten Years Literature.

Francesca Veronesi, Simone Ottavio Zielli, Silvia Brogini, Elena Artioli, Alberto Arceri, Antonio Mazzotti, Cesare Faldini, Gianluca Giavaresi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Francesca VeronesiSurgical Sciences and Technologies, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via Di Barbiano 1/10, 40136 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6750-9376
Simone Ottavio Zielli1st Orthopaedic and Traumatologic Clinic, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via Putti 1, 40136 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0867-1338
Silvia BroginiSurgical Sciences and Technologies, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via Di Barbiano 1/10, 40136 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1229-9367
Elena Artioli1st Orthopaedic and Traumatologic Clinic, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via Putti 1, 40136 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9279-4722
Alberto Arceri1st Orthopaedic and Traumatologic Clinic, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via Putti 1, 40136 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-6486-6300
Antonio Mazzotti1st Orthopaedic and Traumatologic Clinic, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via Putti 1, 40136 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9974-4787
Cesare Faldini1st Orthopaedic and Traumatologic Clinic, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via Putti 1, 40136 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8152-4778
Gianluca GiavaresiSurgical Sciences and Technologies, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via Di Barbiano 1/10, 40136 Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7843-5969

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Scaffolds are widely used devices for the treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus (OCLT), aimed at enhancing mechanical stability and fostering chondrogenic differentiation. A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to evaluate the safety, and clinical and radiological results of scaffolds for OCLT management. On 2 January 2024, a search was performed in four databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus), according to PRISMA guidelines. The risk of bias in the included studies was also evaluated. Thirty clinical studies were included in the qualitative analysis: 12 retrospective case series, 3 retrospective comparative studies, 9 prospective case series, 1 prospective comparative study, and 1 Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT). Natural scaffolds, such as bilayer collagen (COLL)I/III and hyaluronic scaffolds, were the most employed. Only minor adverse events were observed, even if more serious complications were shown, especially after medial malleolar osteotomy. An overall clinical and radiological improvement was observed after a mean of 36.3 months of follow-up. Patient age and Body Mass Index (BMI), lesion size, and location were correlated with the clinical outcomes, while meta-analysis revealed significant improvement in clinical scores with hyaluronic scaffolds compared to microfracture alone. This study highlights the safety and positive clinical outcomes associated with the use of scaffolds for OCLT. In the few available comparative studies, scaffolds have also demonstrated superior clinical outcomes compared to microfractures alone. Nevertheless, the analysis has shown the limitations of the current literature, characterized by an overall low quality and scarcity of RCTs.

Indexed as

clinical studiesosteochondral regenerationsystematic revision of the literaturetalus

Identifiers

PMID39451345
PMCPMC11505056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.