Bridging accelerated medical programmes and workforce demands: a critical evaluation of the four-year direct entry medical degree.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Too many, too soon? Challenges in medical school expansion in the United Kingdom.Human resources for health · 2025
   Article
2. Reconciling the tension between the 'global' and the 'local' in medical education.Medical education · 2025
   Article
3. The challenges of expanding medical student numbers in the UK: A scoping review.Future healthcare journal · 2025
   Review
4. Will four-year medical degrees solve the crisis in medical education?Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine · 2024
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.