Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39451326›Full record

ArticleGels (Basel, Switzerland)2024

Process Mapping of the Sol-Gel Transition in Acid-Initiated Sodium Silicate Solutions.

Marzieh Matinfar, John A Nychka

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Gels (Basel, Switzerland), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Marzieh MatinfarDepartment of Chemical and Materials Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 1H9, Canada.
John A NychkaDepartment of Chemical and Materials Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 1H9, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-8885-3902

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council RGPIN 2019-05379
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fabricating large-scale porous bioactive glass bone scaffolds presents significant challenges. This study aims to develop formable, in situ setting scaffolds with a practical gelation time of about 10 min by mixing 45S5 bioactive glass with sodium silicate (waterglass) and an acid initiator. The effects of pH (2-11), waterglass concentration (15-50 wt.%), and acid initiator type (phosphoric or boric acid) were examined to optimize gelation kinetics and microstructure. A 10 min gelation time was achieved with boric acid and phosphoric acid at various pH levels by adjusting the waterglass concentration. Exponential and polynomial models were proposed to predict gelation times in basic and acidic environments, respectively. The optical properties of the gels were studied qualitatively and quantitatively, providing insights into gelation kinetics and structure. Acidic gels formed smaller particles in a dense network (pores < 550 nm) with higher light transmittance, while basic gels had larger aggregates (pores ~5 µm) and lower transmittance. As the waterglass concentration decreased, pore size and transmittance converged in both groups. The onset of gelation was detected around 8 min using the derivative of light transmittance. This work identifies the key factors controlling waterglass gelation and their impact on gel structure, enabling the tailored creation of formable, in situ setting bioactive glass bone scaffolds.

Indexed as

bone tissue scaffoldcolloidal silicagelation kineticsoptical propertiessilica gelsodium silicate solutionsol–gel

Identifiers

PMID39451326
PMCPMC11507553

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.