Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39451198›Full record

ReviewCells2024

Mini-Review: Tregs as a Tool for Therapy-Obvious and Non-Obvious Challenges and Solutions.

Elena I Morgun, Irina A Govorova, Maria B Chernysheva, Maria A Machinskaya, Ekaterina A Vorotelyak

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cells, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elena I MorgunLaboratory of Cell Biology, Koltzov Institute of Developmental Biology of Russian Academy of Sciences, 26 Vavilov Street, Moscow 119334, Russia.
Irina A GovorovaLaboratory of Cell Biology, Koltzov Institute of Developmental Biology of Russian Academy of Sciences, 26 Vavilov Street, Moscow 119334, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-5107-0621
Maria B ChernyshevaLaboratory of Cell Biology, Koltzov Institute of Developmental Biology of Russian Academy of Sciences, 26 Vavilov Street, Moscow 119334, Russia.
Maria A MachinskayaLaboratory of Cell Biology, Koltzov Institute of Developmental Biology of Russian Academy of Sciences, 26 Vavilov Street, Moscow 119334, Russia.ORCID 0009-0006-3213-7564
Ekaterina A VorotelyakLaboratory of Cell Biology, Koltzov Institute of Developmental Biology of Russian Academy of Sciences, 26 Vavilov Street, Moscow 119334, Russia.ORCID 0000-0001-5405-0212

Funding

Koltzov Institute of Developmental Biology Government program of basic research in Koltzov Institute of Developmental Biology of the Russian Academy of Sciences in 2024 № 0088-2024-0013 and supported by Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation under the Agreement № 075-15
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tregs have the potential to be utilized as a novel therapeutic agent for the treatment of various chronic diseases, including diabetes, Alzheimer's disease, asthma, and rheumatoid arthritis. One of the challenges associated with developing a therapeutic product based on Tregs is the non-selectivity of polyclonal cells. A potential solution to this issue is a generation of antigen-specific CAR-Tregs. Other challenges associated with developing a therapeutic product based on Tregs include the phenotypic instability of these cells in an inflammatory microenvironment, discrepancies between engineered Treg-like cells and natural Tregs, and the expression of dysfunctional isoforms of Treg marker genes. This review presents a summary of proposed strategies for addressing these challenges.

Indexed as

Immunotherapy, AdoptiveT-Lymphocytes, RegulatoryAnimalsHumansCAR-TregsFOXP3immunotherapyTregs

Identifiers

PMID39451198
PMCPMC11506333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.