ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2024
Optimized patient-specific immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies for cancer treatment based on tumor immune microenvironment modeling.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Long-term outcomes of PD-1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced HER2-negative gastric cancer: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Pooled it
- Leveraging Artificial Intelligence and Large Language Models for Cancer Immunotherapy.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Review
- Causal AI for cancer immunotherapy: a narrative framework review of target trial emulation, treatment-effect learning and clinical translation.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Immune checkpoint inhibitors and cardiovascular toxicity: immunology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2025Review
- Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Enhancing patient response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is crucial in cancer immunotherapy. We aim to create a data-driven mathematical model of the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) and utilize deep reinforcement learning (DRL) to optimize patient-specific ICI therapy combined with chemotherapy (ICC). Using patients' genomic and transcriptomic data, we develop an ordinary differential equations (ODEs)-based TIME dynamic evolutionary model to characterize interactions among chemotherapy, ICIs, immune cells, and tumor cells. A DRL agent is trained to determine the personalized optimal ICC therapy. Numerical experiments with real-world data demonstrate that the proposed TIME model can predict ICI therapy response. The DRL-derived personalized ICC therapy outperforms predefined fixed schedules. For tumors with extremely low CD8 + T cell infiltration ('extremely cold tumors'), the DRL agent recommends high-dosage chemotherapy alone. For tumors with higher CD8 + T cell infiltration ('cold' and 'hot tumors'), an appropriate chemotherapy dosage induces CD8 + T cell proliferation, enhancing ICI therapy outcomes. Specifically, for 'hot tumors', chemotherapy and ICI are administered simultaneously, while for 'cold tumors', a mid-dosage of chemotherapy makes the TIME 'hotter' before ICI administration. However, in several 'cold tumors' with rapid resistant tumor cell growth, ICC eventually fails. This study highlights the potential of utilizing real-world clinical data and DRL algorithm to develop personalized optimal ICC by understanding the complex biological dynamics of a patient's TIME. Our ODE-based TIME dynamic evolutionary model offers a theoretical framework for determining the best use of ICI, and the proposed DRL agent may guide personalized ICC schedules.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.