ArticleSystematic biology2025
A Phylogenomic Backbone for Acoelomorpha Inferred From Transcriptomic Data.
Article in Systematic biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Patterns of Conservation and Loss of Hox Genes in Xenacoelomorph Lineage Since Divergence From Last Common Bilaterian Ancestor.Genome biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Article
- Absence of conserved immune signalling pathways and increased pathogen susceptibility associated to photosymbiosis in acoels.BMC biology · 2026Article
- Molecular evidence from xenacoelomorph gonopore formation supports homology with the bilaterian anus.Nature ecology & evolution · 2025Article
- Developmental, regenerative, and behavioral dynamics in acoel reproduction.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Genomics Sheds New Light on the Ancestral Bilaterian Opsin Repertoire and Suggests Rhabdomeric Phototransduction in Xenacoelomorpha.Genome biology and evolution · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Xenacoelomorpha are mostly microscopic, morphologically simple worms, lacking many structures typical of other bilaterians. Xenacoelomorphs-which include three main groups, namely Acoela, Nemertodermatida, and Xenoturbella-have been proposed to be an early diverging Bilateria, sister to protostomes and deuterostomes, but other phylogenomic analyses have recovered this clade nested within the deuterostomes, as sister to Ambulacraria. The position of Xenacoelomorpha within the metazoan tree has understandably attracted a lot of attention, overshadowing the study of phylogenetic relationships within this group. Given that Xenoturbella includes only six species whose relationships are well understood, we decided to focus on the most speciose Acoelomorpha (Acoela + Nemertodermatida). Here, we have sequenced 29 transcriptomes, doubling the number of sequenced species, to infer a backbone tree for Acoelomorpha based on genomic data. The recovered topology is mostly congruent with previous studies. The most important difference is the recovery of Paratomella as the first off-shoot within Acoela, dramatically changing the reconstruction of the ancestral acoel. Besides, we have detected incongruence between the gene trees and the species tree, likely linked to incomplete lineage sorting, and some signal of introgression between the families Dakuidae and Mecynostomidae, which hampers inferring the correct placement of this family and, particularly, of the genus Notocelis. We have also used this dataset to infer for the first time diversification times within Acoelomorpha, which coincide with known bilaterian diversification and extinction events. Given the importance of morphological data in acoelomorph phylogenetics, we tested several partitions and models. Although morphological data failed to recover a robust phylogeny, phylogenetic placement has proven to be a suitable alternative when a reference phylogeny is available.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.