Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39451042›Full record

ReviewJournal of advanced nursing2024

Decent and Precarious Work Among Nursing and Care Workers: A Mixed-Method Systematic Review.

Marja Hult, Marjo Ring, Heta Siranko, Mari Kangasniemi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of advanced nursing, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The decent work level of nurses in China: A systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marja HultDepartment of Sustainable Well-Being, South-Eastern Finland University of Applied Sciences, Mikkeli, Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2020-5914
Marjo RingDepartment of Sustainable Well-Being, South-Eastern Finland University of Applied Sciences, Mikkeli, Finland.
Heta SirankoDepartment of Sustainable Well-Being, South-Eastern Finland University of Applied Sciences, Mikkeli, Finland.
Mari KangasniemiDepartment of Nursing Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.

Funding

Työsuojelurahasto 230355
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo identify and describe evidence from original studies on the contextual factors, dimensions, and outcomes of decent and precarious work among nursing and care workers.

designThis is a mixed-methods systematic review. DATA SOURCES: The Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO and SocINDEX databases were searched on January 11, 2024.

methodsTwo reviewers independently applied eligibility criteria, selected studies, and conducted quality appraisals. We employed data-based convergent synthesis as the data synthesis method. The dimensions of decent and precarious work were analysed deductively using the Employment Quality Framework.

resultsFive studies on decent work and 13 studies on precarious work were included. Five contextual factors were common, though opposite, in both decent and precarious work studies: employment contract, position, financial situation, age, and work experience. Three outcomes were also common. Decent work increased, and precarious work decreased, physical and mental health and empowerment, whereas turnover was decreased by decent work and increased by precarious work.

conclusionsChallenges can be converted into positive outcomes for the future, moving towards meaningful work, fair jobs, sustainable employment policies, and attractive career prospects. To achieve this, more knowledge is needed about employment quality in nursing and care work. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION: Young nurses and care workers should be provided opportunities to fully engage in their work and organisations. Training is also crucial for managers, as it decreases authoritarian and controlling management practices. IMPACT: This review is the first to synthesise research evidence on decent and precarious work in nursing and care work, confirming that they are opposite concepts of employment quality. The results benefit nurses and care workers, organisations, and decision-makers. REPORTING

methodThe study was reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) checklist. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No Patient or Public Contribution.

Indexed as

care workdecent workemployment qualitynursingprecarious worksystematic review

Identifiers

PMID39451042
PMCPMC12080086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.