ArticleThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2025
No accelerated progression of subclinical atherosclerosis with integrase strand transfer inhibitors compared to non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors.
Article in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe role of integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTI) in the cardiovascular risk of people with HIV is controversial.
objectivesTo assess the association of INSTI to subclinical atherosclerosis progression measured with the carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT).
methodsProspective study in virologically suppressed people with HIV receiving INSTI- or NNRTI-based regimens. cIMT was measured at baseline, 48 and 96 weeks. cIMT progression was analysed both as a continuous and categorical variable, defined as cIMT increase ≥ 10% and/or new carotid plaque. Adjustments through Cox proportional hazard regression and linear mixed models, and propensity score matching were conducted.
results190 participants were recruited and 173 completed the 96 week follow-up. 107 (56.3%) were receiving an INSTI-containing, 128 (67.4%) a NNRTI-containing and 45 (23.7%) a NNRTI plus an INSTI-containing regimen. The overall median (IQR) 2-year change of cIMT was 0.029 (-0.041 to 0.124) mm; 87 (45.8%) participants experienced a cIMT increase ≥ 10%, of whom 54 (28.4%) developed a new carotid plaque. Adjusted Cox regression showed no differences between INSTI and NNRTI groups in the categorical 2-year progression of cIMT, both including or excluding participants receiving INSTI + NNRTI. Similar results were observed for the continuous cIMT increase through adjusted linear mixed models. Propensity score matching showed no significant differences in the 2 year cIMT change between treatment groups [0.049 mm (-0.031-0.103) in the INSTI group versus 0.047 mm (-0.023-0.115) in the NNRTI group; P = 0.647]. cIMT progression was associated with traditional cardiovascular risk factors.
conclusionsINSTI-based regimens are not associated with increased progression of subclinical atherosclerosis when compared to NNRTI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.