Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39450793›Full record

ArticleTurkish archives of pediatrics2024

Comparison of Real-time Polymerase Chain Reaction and Culture for Targeting Pathogens in Pediatric Severe Community-Acquired Pneumonia.

Khai Quang Tran, Van Hung Pham, Chau Minh Vo, Quan Minh Pham, Phuong Minh Nguyen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish archives of pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Khai Quang TranDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Can Tho University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Can Tho City, Vietnam.
Van Hung PhamLaboratory of Nam Khoa Biotek Company, Vietnam Research and Development Institute of Clinical Microbiology, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Chau Minh VoDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Can Tho University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Can Tho City, Vietnam.
Quan Minh PhamDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Can Tho University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Can Tho City, Vietnam.
Phuong Minh NguyenDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Can Tho University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Can Tho City, Vietnam.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to determine the frequency of pathogen detection by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR), the frequency of pathogen isolation by culture; and compare the value of real-time PCR and culture of nasopharyngeal aspiration samples in patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia (sCAP). Materials and Methods: It was a prospective and descriptive study. All pediatric patients diagnosed with sCAP were performed real-time PCR and culture of nasopharyngeal aspiration samples. Results: A total of 336 patient samples were obtained from children with sCAP. Real-time PCR detected pathogens in 312 patients (92.9%), while culture isolated bacteria in 228 patients (67.9%). Coinfections were reported in 279 cases (83.0%) through real-time PCR. The frequency of agreement between culture and real-time PCR was quite high (P < .001). Conclusion: Real-time PCR demonstrated more ability for detecting microorganisms than culture. This finding highlighted the value of real-time PCR for targeting pathogens in children with sCAP, particularly in cases involving complex pathogens or those requiring timely identification.

Indexed as

culturepediatricReal-time polymerase chain reactionsevere community-acquired pneumonia

Identifiers

PMID39450793
PMCPMC11332497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.