Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39450751›Full record

ArticleParasitology2024

Assessment of farmers' knowledge, attitudes and control practices (KAP) to mitigate acaricide resistance and tick-borne diseases.

Sunita Jamra, Mukesh Shakya, Anant K Jayraw, Vivek Agrawal, Mamta Singh, Anil Kumar Sharma, Gajendra N Bhangale, Gaya P Jatav, Nirmala Jamra

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasitology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Open veterinary journal · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sunita JamraDepartment of Veterinary Parasitology, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry (NDVSU), Mhow-453446, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Mukesh ShakyaDepartment of Veterinary Parasitology, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry (NDVSU), Mhow-453446, Madhya Pradesh, India.ORCID 0000-0001-8780-6733
Anant K JayrawDepartment of Veterinary Parasitology, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry (NDVSU), Mhow-453446, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Vivek AgrawalDepartment of Veterinary Parasitology, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry (NDVSU), Mhow-453446, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Mamta SinghDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry (NDVSU), Mhow-453446, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Anil Kumar SharmaSchool of Agriculture, Uttaranchal University, Dehradun-248007, Uttarakhand, India.
Gajendra N BhangaleDepartment of Veterinary Parasitology, College of Veterinary and Animal Sciences (MAFSU), Parbhani-431402, Maharashtra, India.
Gaya P JatavDepartment of Veterinary Pathology, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry (NDVSU), Mhow-453446, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Nirmala JamraDepartment of Veterinary Parasitology, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry (NDVSU), Mhow-453446, Madhya Pradesh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A knowledge, attitudes and control practices (KAP)-based study on ticks and tick-borne diseases (TTBD) and resistance development in ticks was conducted in Dhar district of Madhya Pradesh covering 200 livestock owners using a questionnaire. Based on our scoring criteria, results indicated only 25% (19.16–31.60) respondents possessing basic knowledge of TTBDs while 75% (68.40–80.84) respondents were not aware of TBDs. Due to lack of proper awareness of TTBDs, about 1.28 times more respondents (OR 95% CI 0.42–3.86) were having heavy tick infestations in their animals. However, about 36.5% (29.82–43.58) respondents showed a favourable attitude towards the adoption of different tick control practices; consequently, their animals showed low-level infestation. Amongst various feeding systems for animals, a mixed type of feeding system was mostly adopted by 57.5% respondents followed by manger system (37.5%) while grazing was the least adopted method (5%). Results indicated that the grazing animals were 6 times (OR 95% CI 2.93–12.28) more susceptible to ticks and possessed heavy tick infestation. Resistance status of collected tick isolates of

Indexed as

AcaricidesFarmersHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeTick-Borne DiseasesTick ControlTick InfestationsAdultAnimalsDrug ResistanceFemaleHumansIndiaLivestockMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesTicksAcaricidesacaricidedeltamethrinepidemiologyfipronilHyalomma anatolicumresistanceRhipicephalus microplus

Identifiers

PMID39450751
PMCPMC11770514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.