Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39450717›Full record

Observational studyJournal of the American Heart Association2024

Stent Underexpansion Is an Underestimated Cause of Intrastent Restenosis: Insights From RESTO Registry.

Géraud Souteyrand, Thomas Mouyen, Benjamin Honton, Aurélien Mulliez, Benoit Lattuca, Jean-Guillaume Dilinger, Sébastien Levesque, Grégoire Range, Nicolas Combaret, Stéphanie Marliere and 5 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04268875 (Morphological Parameters of In-stent RESTenosis Assessed and Identified by OCT), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04268875 nacompletednot on this map

Morphological Parameters of In-stent RESTenosis Assessed and Identified by OCT

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, Clermont-FerrandRan2019 to 2022Enrolled307ConditionsIn-stent RestenosisArmsOptical Coherence Tomography (OCT)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Géraud SouteyrandInstitut Pascal, Thérapies Guidées par l'Image, CNRS SIGMA UCA UMR 6602 University Hospital Gabriel Montpied Clermont-Ferrand France.ORCID 0000-0002-5226-6076
Thomas MouyenJacques Lacarin Vichy Hospital Centre Vichy Cedex France.ORCID 0000-0003-4154-0161
Benjamin HontonClinique Pasteur Toulouse France.
Aurélien MulliezInstitut Pascal, Thérapies Guidées par l'Image, CNRS SIGMA UCA UMR 6602 University Hospital Gabriel Montpied Clermont-Ferrand France.
Benoit LattucaUniversity Hospital of Nimes Nimes France.
Jean-Guillaume DilingerUniversité Paris-Cité, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Lariboisière, and Inserm U-942 Paris France.
Sébastien LevesqueCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers Poitiers France.
Grégoire RangeLes hôpitaux de Chartres Chartres France.
Nicolas CombaretInstitut Pascal, Thérapies Guidées par l'Image, CNRS SIGMA UCA UMR 6602 University Hospital Gabriel Montpied Clermont-Ferrand France.
Stéphanie MarliereCHU Grenoble Grenoble France.
Ouarda LamallemInstitut Pascal, Thérapies Guidées par l'Image, CNRS SIGMA UCA UMR 6602 University Hospital Gabriel Montpied Clermont-Ferrand France.
Marine QuillotCentre Hospitalier Henri Duffaut Avignon France.
Edouard GerbaudCHU Bordeaux Bordeaux France.
Pascal MotreffInstitut Pascal, Thérapies Guidées par l'Image, CNRS SIGMA UCA UMR 6602 University Hospital Gabriel Montpied Clermont-Ferrand France.
Nicolas AmabileInstitut Cardiovasculaire Paris Sud Massy France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite improvement in devices, in-stent restenosis remains a frequent and challenging complication of percutaneous coronary interventions. METHODS AND

resultsThe RESTO (Morphological Parameters of In-Stent Restenosis Assessed and Identified by OCT [Optical Coherence Tomography]; study NCT04268875) was a prospective multicenter registry including patients presenting with coronary syndromes related to in-stent restenosis. All patients underwent preintervention OCT analysis, which led to analysis of in-stent restenosis phenotype, number of strut layers, and presence of stent underexpansion. The primary end point was the in-stent restenosis type according to the OCT morphological classification. The 1-year incidence of target vessel failure (a composite of death from cardiac causes, target-vessel myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target-vessel revascularization) was assessed. The study included 297 patients. The culprit stent was a drug-eluting stent in 74.2% of cases. OCT analysis revealed the presence of neoatherosclerosis in 57% (52% calcified), neointimal hyperplasia in 43% (58% homogeneous), stent underexpansion (minimal stent area <4.5 mm

conclusionsOCT identified neoatherosclerosis and neointimal hyperplasia in comparable proportions. Stent underexpansion was frequent and favored subsequent adverse clinical outcomes.

Indexed as

Coronary RestenosisDrug-Eluting StentsPercutaneous Coronary InterventionRegistriesTomography, Optical CoherenceAgedCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary VesselsFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMiddle AgedNeointimaProspective StudiesRisk Factorsin‐stent restenosisoptical coherence tomographyunderexpansion

Identifiers

PMID39450717
PMCPMC11935687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.