Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39450704›Full record

ArticleClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research2025

Germline DNA Damage Repair Variants and Prognosis of Patients with High-Risk or Metastatic Prostate Cancer.

Konrad H Stopsack, Joseph Vijai, Michael Conry, Jacob E Berchuck, Yelena Kemel, Samantha E Vasselman, Dory A Freeman, Gwo-Shu M Lee, Diana Mandelker, David B Solit and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Association of Homologous Recombination Repair Alterations with Outcomes in Patients with Metastatic Hormone-Sensitive Prostate Cancer.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2025
    Article
  7. Prognostic Significance ofJCO precision oncology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Konrad H Stopsack *Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-0722-1311
Joseph Vijai *Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-7933-151X
Michael ConryDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0003-1904-8947
Jacob E BerchuckDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0002-7607-2428
Yelena KemelThe Robert and Kate Niehaus Center for Inherited Cancer Genomics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-5042-5651
Samantha E VasselmanDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.ORCID 0009-0003-6903-1884
Dory A FreemanDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0003-2617-0641
Gwo-Shu M LeeDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0001-9236-9195
Diana MandelkerDepartment of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0003-4154-0567
David B SolitDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-6614-802X
Michael J MorrisDepartment of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-9454-0096
Kathryn L PenneyDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0002-2815-3450
Wassim Abida *Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-9006-7043
Kenneth Offit *Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0002-2180-2032
Lorelei A Mucci *Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0002-2551-4927
Philip W Kantoff *Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.ORCID 0000-0001-7275-0597
Mark M Pomerantz *Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0003-4914-1157

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
VectorP30CA006516 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE · PI JENNIFER W MACK · 1985 to 2026
$330.6M
SPORE In Prostate CancerP50CA092629 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI JAMES A EASTHAM · 2001 to 2026
$63.0M
Cancer Epidemiology Cohort in Male Health ProfessionalsU01CA167552 · NCI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY D/B/A HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI Lorelei Mucci, Walter C. Willett · 2017 to 2026
$17.0M
The Impact of DNA Damage Repair Abnormalities in Prostate CancerP01CA228696 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI OFFIT, KENNETH, POMERANTZ, MARK M. · 2019 to 2024
$8.7M
National Cancer Institute (NCI) P01CA228696National Cancer Institute (NCI) P30CA008748National Cancer Institute (NCI) U01CA167552NCI NIH HHS P01 CA228696NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006516NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS P50 CA092629NCI NIH HHS U01 CA167552Prostate Cancer Foundation (PCF) 18CHAL05
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDeleterious germline variants in certain DNA repair genes are risk factors for developing aggressive prostate cancer. The objective was to quantify their prognostic impact after prostate cancer diagnosis. EXPERIMENTAL

designMen with prostate cancer, predominantly of European ancestry, were included from four cohorts with long-term follow-up. Pathogenic or likely pathogenic germline variants in 26 DNA repair genes were assessed in relation to metastasis-free survival in high-risk localized prostate cancer and to overall survival in metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

resultsAmong 3,525 patients initially diagnosed with nonmetastatic prostate cancer, 2,594 had high-risk localized prostate cancer, 429 had mCSPC, and 502 had mCRPC at inclusion. BRCA2 variant carriers did not have worse metastasis-free survival in high-risk localized prostate cancer [hazard ratio (HR), 1.01; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.69-1.46] or overall survival in mCSPC (HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.14-1.45) or mCRPC (HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.31-1.17) compared with noncarriers of DNA repair variants. Among 868 additional patients with de novo metastatic (M1) prostate cancer, BRCA2 variant carriers tended to have worse overall survival (HR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.01-2.51). BRCA2 prognostic associations were not explained by radiation, PARP inhibitor, or platinum therapy. Results for other genes were limited in precision because variants were less common.

conclusionsAmong patients with high-risk or metastatic prostate cancer who were initially diagnosed with and treated for nonmetastatic tumors, germline DNA repair variants in BRCA2 do not confer a substantially worse prognosis.

Indexed as

DNA RepairGerm-Line MutationProstatic NeoplasmsAgedBiomarkers, TumorBRCA2 ProteinDNA DamageGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisPrognosisProstatic Neoplasms, Castration-ResistantRisk FactorsBiomarkers, TumorBRCA2 ProteinBRCA2 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID39450704
PMCPMC12407385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.