Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39450696›Full record

ArticleAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2024

Leveraging Blood Components for 3D Printing Applications Through Programmable Ink Engineering Approaches.

Rita Sobreiro-Almeida, Sara C Santos, Monize C Decarli, Marcelo Costa, Tiago R Correia, Joanna Babilotte, Catarina A Custódio, Lorenzo Moroni, João F Mano

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Rita Sobreiro-AlmeidaDepartment of Chemistry, CICECO - Aveiro Institute of Materials, University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, Aveiro, 3810-193, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-4433-8890
Sara C SantosDepartment of Chemistry, CICECO - Aveiro Institute of Materials, University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, Aveiro, 3810-193, Portugal.
Monize C DecarliComplex Tissue Regeneration department, MERLN Institute for Technology-Inspired Regenerative Medicine, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 40, Maastricht, 6229 ET, The Netherlands.
Marcelo CostaDepartment of Chemistry, CICECO - Aveiro Institute of Materials, University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, Aveiro, 3810-193, Portugal.
Tiago R CorreiaDepartment of Chemistry, CICECO - Aveiro Institute of Materials, University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, Aveiro, 3810-193, Portugal.
Joanna BabilotteComplex Tissue Regeneration department, MERLN Institute for Technology-Inspired Regenerative Medicine, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 40, Maastricht, 6229 ET, The Netherlands.
Catarina A CustódioDepartment of Chemistry, CICECO - Aveiro Institute of Materials, University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, Aveiro, 3810-193, Portugal.
Lorenzo MoroniComplex Tissue Regeneration department, MERLN Institute for Technology-Inspired Regenerative Medicine, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 40, Maastricht, 6229 ET, The Netherlands.
João F ManoDepartment of Chemistry, CICECO - Aveiro Institute of Materials, University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, Aveiro, 3810-193, Portugal.

Funding

European Commission 953169European Commission BI/UI89/10722/2023Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia 10.54499/2020.01647.CEECIND/CP1589/CT0034Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia 10.54499/2022.04605.CEECIND/CP1720/CT0021Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia 10.54499/LA/P/0006/2020Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia 10.54499/UIDB/50011/2020Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia 10.54499/UIDP/50011/2020Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia 2023.00647.BDFundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia SFRH/BD/144520/2019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study proposes a tunable ink engineering methodology to allow 3D printing processability of highly bioactive but otherwise low-viscous and unprintable blood-derived materials. The hypothesis relies on improving the viscoelasticity and shear thinning behavior of platelet lysates (PL) and albumins (BSA) solutions by covalent coupling, enabling simultaneous extrusion and photocrosslinking upon filament deposition. The available amine groups on proteins (PL and BSA) are exploited for coupling with carboxyl groups present in methacrylated proteins (hPLMA and BSAMA), by leveraging carbodiimide chemistry. This reaction enabled the creation of a pre-gel from these extremely low-viscous materials (≈ 1 Pa), with precise tuning of the reaction, resulting in inks with a range of controlled viscosities and elasticities. Shape-fidelity analysis is performed on 3D-printed multilayered constructs, demonstrating the ability to reach clinically relevant sizes (>2 cm in size). After photocrosslinking, the scaffolds showcased a mechanically robust structure with sustained protein release over time. Bioactivity is evaluated using human adipose-derived stem cells, resulting in increased viability and metabolic activity over time. The herein described research methodology widens the possibilities for the use of low-viscosity materials in 3D printing but also enables the direct application of patient and blood-derived materials in precision medicine.

Indexed as

InkPrinting, Three-DimensionalTissue EngineeringBiocompatible MaterialsBioprintingBlood PlateletsHumansTissue ScaffoldsViscosityBiocompatible Materials3D printingalbuminhydrogelink engineeringphotocrosslinkingplatelet lysatesprotein

Identifiers

PMID39450696
PMCPMC11653660

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.