Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39450662›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of laryngology and otology2025

Do adolescents with hearing loss use social media and the internet differently from their hearing peers?

Deniz Tuz, Busra Altın, Merve Ozbal Batuk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of laryngology and otology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Deniz TuzDepartment of Audiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ege University, İzmir, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9265-2940
Busra AltınDepartment of Audiology, Faculty of Healthy Sciences, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.
Merve Ozbal BatukDepartment of Audiology, Faculty of Healthy Sciences, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this study was to compare the internet and social media use of teenagers with hearing loss with that of their normal hearing peers.

methodsThe study included 27 hearing-impaired and 27 normal-hearing peers (12-18 years). The Social Media Attitude Scale, the Internet Use Purposes Scale, University of California, Los Angeles Loneliness Scale and the Problematic Internet Use Scale were used to compare hearing-loss and normal-hearing groups.

resultsThe social isolation subscale and Social Media Attitude Scale total score differed between groups (

conclusionWhile adolescents with hearing loss have limited online educational resources, problematic internet use is a concern. When overused, the internet can reduce loneliness, but it can also have harmful consequences.

Indexed as

Hearing LossInternetInternet UseSocial MediaAdolescentChildFemaleHumansLonelinessMalePeer GroupSocial IsolationSurveys and Questionnairescochlear implantshearing aidshearing lossinternetinternet use

Identifiers

PMID39450662
PMCPMC12092167

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.