ArticleMolecular medicine reports2025
Silencing of
Article in Molecular medicine reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Biomimetic gender-specific human skin model based on gonads/epidermis-on-a-chip.Bioactive materials · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Estrogen‑related receptor (ERR) is an orphan nuclear receptor structurally akin to the estrogen receptor. ERR is expressed in tissues with active energy metabolism and regulates intracellular metabolic functions. Additionally, ERRs are known to be strongly expressed in the epidermis of skin tissue, but their functions are unknown. The present study investigated the function of ERRα in human skin fibroblasts. ERRα expressed in human dermal fibroblast TIG113 was knocked down using small interfering (si)RNA and gene expression was comprehensively analyzed using microarrays 48 h later. Pathway analysis was performed using Wikipathways on genes exhibiting expression changes of ≥1.5‑fold. Expression of cell cycle‑related and apoptosis‑related genes was compared using reverse transcription‑quantitative PCR. After treating TIG113 cells with siERRα for 72 h, cell proliferation was assessed using the Cell Counting Kit‑8 or a scratch wound healing assay and apoptotic cells were measured using the Poly Caspase Assay Kit. Cell cycle analysis was performed using flow cytometry. The expression of the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.