Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39450536›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular medicine2025

TP53 mutations in cancer: Molecular features and therapeutic opportunities (Review).

Maria Lina Tornesello

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 70 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
70citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

70 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. MedComm · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Modulation ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

10 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Maria Lina TorneselloMolecular Biology and Viral Oncology Unit, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, I-80131 Napoli, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The tumour suppressor factor p53 plays an essential role in regulating numerous cellular processes, including the cell cycle, DNA repair, apoptosis, autophagy, cell metabolism and immune response. TP53 is the most commonly mutated gene in human cancers. These mutations are primarily non‑synonymous changes that produce mutant p53 proteins characterized by loss of function, a dominant negative effect on p53 tetramerisation and gain of function (GOF). GOF mutations not only disrupt the tumour‑suppressive activities of p53 but also endow the mutant proteins with new oncogenic properties. Recent studies analysing different pathogenic features of mutant p53 in cancer‑derived cell lines have demonstrated that restoring wild‑type p53, rather than removing GOF mutations, reduces cancer cell growth. These findings suggest that therapeutic strategies for reactivating wild‑type p53 function in cancer cells may bring a greater benefit than approaches halting mutant p53. This approach could involve the use of small molecules, gene therapy and other methods to re‑establish wild‑type p53 activity. This review describes the complexity of the biological activities of different p53 mutants and summarizes the current therapeutic approaches to restore p53 function.

Indexed as

MutationNeoplasmsTumor Suppressor Protein p53AnimalsHumansTP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53dominant negative effectgain‑of‑functionloss‑of‑functionmissense mutationstherapyTP53tumour suppressor

Identifiers

PMID39450536
PMCPMC11554381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.