Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39450444›Full record

ArticleActa ophthalmologica2025

Looking beyond the eyes of the patient: The importance of effective communication in the treatment of age-related macular degeneration.

Mariska Scheffer, Juliane Menting, Petra Rausch-Koster, Ruth van Nispen, Sandra van Dulmen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta ophthalmologica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Patient-Registered Nurse Communication: Exploring Patients' Expectations and Experience in Primary Care Consultations.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Observational
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mariska SchefferNivel (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0117-9471
Juliane MentingNivel (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Petra Rausch-KosterOphthalmology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Ruth van NispenOphthalmology, Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Sandra van DulmenNivel (Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research), Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Funding

Stichting InZicht/ZonMw 9431.4001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePatients with exudative and nonexudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD) can experience physical, mental, social, administrative or financial burden that are associated with the treatment of this progressive chronic disease. The role of healthcare providers in supporting patients who experience high treatment burden can be important, especially when it comes to effective communication. Despite previous research underlining the need to improve patient-provider communication in AMD care, patient experiences with communication, and how these are related to perceived treatment burden, remain underexplored.

methodsA survey was distributed among Dutch patients with AMD, which contained questions on several aspects of communication with the patient's ophthalmologist, such as the Quality Of communication Through the patients' Eyes (QUOTE-COMM, including task-, affect- and therapy-oriented communication) questionnaire. Patients were primarily enlisted through a patient association.

resultsA total of 162 patients completed the questionnaire, of which 133 provided fully completed responses. While patients reported positive experiences with affect-oriented communication of their ophthalmologist, they rated task- and therapy-oriented communication as below their expectations. Most patients wished to receive (additional) information on AMD-related costs (71%), future perspectives (71%) and coping with negative emotions pertaining to the disease (68%). Both lower experience scores on task- and affect-oriented communication and lower self-efficacy were associated with higher administrative burden and mental burden among patients.

conclusionOur study shows that current communication, information provision and decision-making do not fully meet patients' needs and preferences. Enhancing patient-provider communication seems important, as effective dialogue is likely to diminish patients' perceived treatment burden.

Indexed as

CommunicationMacular DegenerationPhysician-Patient RelationsQuality of LifeAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsPatient SatisfactionSurveys and QuestionnairesWet Macular Degenerationage‐related macular degenerationcommunicationinformation provisionperceived efficacytreatment burden

Identifiers

PMID39450444
PMCPMC11810561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.