Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39450442›Full record

ArticleThe Gerontologist2024

"It Made Me Change the Way I Do Business": Outcomes From Age-Friendly Community Initiatives as Systems Change.

Emily A Greenfield, Natalie E Pope

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Gerontologist, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Emily A GreenfieldSchool of Social Work, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5743-457X
Natalie E PopeSchool of Social Work, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0741-3505

Funding

Henry and Marilyn Taub Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesSince the early 2000s, a global age-friendly communities (AFC) movement has called for improving the built, social, and service environments of localities for aging. Yet research on the outcomes of AFC initiatives, as programmatic efforts toward AFC progress, remains in its nascence. Drawing on "The Water of Systems Change" framework, our study aimed to address this gap by exploring the extent to which accomplishments of AFC initiatives are indicative of altering six conditions for systems change: policies, organizational practices, resource allocations, power dynamics, relationships, and mental models. RESEARCH DESIGN AND

methodsWe analyzed qualitative data from 26 key informant interviews across eight mature AFC initiatives in the northeastern United States (U.S.). We engaged in iterative phases of thematic analysis to explore how the initiatives' accomplishments, as described by the participants, align with each of six focal conditions for systems change.

resultsWe found especially robust and consistent evidence for outcomes in terms of enhanced organizational practices on aging; resource flows; connections within and across communities; and mental models about older adults. Evidence for outcomes concerning changes in power dynamics and policy was more limited. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Conceptualizing AFC initiatives as systems-change interventions can bolster research, evaluation, and program development as the movement proliferates and diversifies into the 21st century. Insights can help to advance praxis that empowers AFC leaders as changemakers for "successful aging" at the level of society.

Indexed as

Qualitative ResearchAgedAgingHumansIndependent LivingNew EnglandResidence CharacteristicsAdvocacyAging in placeEvaluationPublic policySocial movement

Identifiers

PMID39450442
PMCPMC11638776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.