ArticleJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics2024
Comparative evaluation of postoperative pain and periapical healing after root canal treatment using three different endodontic sealers: A randomized controlled clinical trial.
Article in Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- A novel micro-debulking device for periapical lesion management - A case series.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2026Article
- Comparative Molecular Effects of Dexmedetomidine and Propofol on Osteoblast Migration and Osteogenic Gene Expression at Pediatric-Equivalent Concentrations: An In Vitro Study.Current issues in molecular biology · 2026Article
- From lesion to resolution: A cone-beam computed tomography-based retrospective comparison of bioactive materials in nonsurgical root canal therapy.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2026Article
- Efficacy of Bioceramic Cements Versus Conventional Cements in the Prognosis of Endodontic Treatments in Patients with Apical Periodontitis: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis.Iranian endodontic journal · 2026Review
- Comparative evaluation of pain and bacterial reduction in one-visit and two-visit retreatment of single-rooted teeth: A randomized clinical trial.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2025Article
- Effect of low-level laser therapy on postoperative pain following root canal filling with resin-based and bioceramic sealers: A double-blinded randomized clinical trial.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2025Article
- Change in serum biomarker levels in patients of apical periodontitis after root canal treatment using two different root canal sealers: A randomized controlled trial.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2025Article
- Randomised Clinical Trial: Effect of AH Plus and Neosealer Flo on Postoperative Pain and Healing of Periapical Lesions.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Comparative evaluation of physicochemical properties of various root canal sealers: AnJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2025Article
- Comparative evaluation of three accidentally extruded sealers in periapical healing - An evidence - based study.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2025Article
- Clinical applications and perceptions of bioceramics in endodontics: a cross-sectional survey.Biomaterial investigations in dentistry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: A randomized controlled clinical trial to evaluate postoperative pain and investigate periapical healing after root canal treatment using eugenol, resin-based, and calcium silicate-based sealers (CSBSs) sealers. Materials and Methods: Sixty-three individuals diagnosed with apical periodontitis confirmed using cold test and electronic pulp tester, periapical pathology with periapical index score of 2 or more, previous endodontic treatment failure exhibiting a visual analog scale pain score of 3 or above, were enrolled in this investigation. The patients were randomly allocated into three groups and following biomechanical preparation, the canals were obturated using Meta CeraSeal, AH plus, and eugenol-based sealers. Postprocedural pain intensity was assessed at 24 h, 48 h, and 7 days, while periapical healing was evaluated at 3- and 6-month follow-ups. Statistical analysis was done using the Chi-square and Friedman's test. Results: The mean of periapical lesions for Meta CeraSeal (4.7, 1.6), AH Plus (4.68, 3.19), 24 and eugenol-based (2.66, 1.75) at 3 months and 6 months, respectively. The mean & std. deviation of pain scores at 24 h for Meta CeraSeal (0.62 ± 1.857), AH Plus (1.62 ± 1.962), and eugenol-based (0.48 ± 1.250). At 48 h for Meta CeraSeal (0.33 ± 1.528), AH Plus (1.33 ± 1.798). On the 7 Conclusions: No suggestive dissimilarity was noted between eugenol, resin-based, and CSBSs sealers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.