ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2024
Clinical insights into tooth extraction via torsion method: a biomechanical analysis of the tooth-periodontal ligament complex.
Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A dual approach to third molar complexity: correlating fractal analysis with the pederson difficulty index - non-clinical research article.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- The Influence of the Periodontal Breakdown over the Amount of Orthodontic Force Reaching the Dental Pulp and NVB During Orthodontic Movements-A Biomechanical Finite Element Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- The Amount of Orthodontic Force Reaching the Dental Pulp and Neuro-Vascular Bundle During Orthodontic Movements in the Intact Periodontium.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Article
- Periodontal Breakdown, Orthodontic Movements and Pulpal Ischemia Correlations-A Comparison Between Five Study Methods.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traditionally, extracting single, flat- or curved-rooted teeth through twisting is unfeasible. However, our clinical practice suggests that such teeth can be extracted efficiently through moderate twisting in a minimally invasive manner. Given the lack of studies on biomechanics of the tooth-periodontal ligament (PDL) complex during torsion, which has further constrained its application, we assessed the feasibility of the torsion method for extracting single-rooted teeth and evaluated its minimally invasive potential. Using three-dimensional finite element analysis, we examined the stress distribution of the tooth and PDL during torsion. Then, we examined changes in the optimal torsion angle (OTA) and stress distribution across various anatomical scenarios. During torsion loading, stress concentration was primarily observed on the sing-rooted tooth surface near the alveolar crest, whereas molars at the root furcation. The OTA was found to increase under conditions such as narrowing of root width, decrease in the root apical curvature, change from type I to IV bone, alveolar bone loss, and shortening of root length. Moreover, the clinically validated model demonstrated that 74% of outcomes fell within the standard OTA range. In conclusion, the decrease in PDL area necessitated a larger angle for complete PDL tearing. Single-rooted teeth with root width-to-thickness ratios of ≥0.42 and apical curvatures of ≤30°are suitable for extraction using the torsion method. This study confirms the feasibility of the torsion method for minimally invasive tooth extraction and expands its indications, laying the theoretical foundation and essential insights for its clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.