Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39450319›Full record

ArticleAging and health research2024

Social infrastructure and health among mid-life and older adults in rural America: An environmental scan of existing data.

Danielle Rhubart, Megan Henly, M Aaron Guest, Carrie Henning-Smith, Mary Anne Powell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Aging and health research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. The social environment and cognitive aging over the life course: laying out critical concepts and research gaps.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Danielle RhubartDepartment of Biobehavioral Health, The Pennsylvania State University, Penn State University, 414 Biobehavioral Health Building, University Park, PA 16802, United States.
Megan HenlyInstitute on Disability, University of New Hampshire, 10 West Edge Drive, Suite 101, Durham, NH 03824 United States.
M Aaron GuestCenter for Innovation in Healthy and Resilient Aging, Edson College of Nursing & Health Innovation, Arizona State University, 550 3rd Street, Phoenix, AZ 85004, United States.
Carrie Henning-SmithDivision of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, 2221 University Ave., SE (Suite 350), Minneapolis, MN 55414, United States.
Mary Anne PowellDivision of Health Policy and Management, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, 2221 University Ave., SE (Suite 350), Minneapolis, MN 55414, United States.

Funding

The Population Research Institute: Development CoreP2CHD041025 · NICHD · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI Brian Thiede · 2016 to 2026
$9.0M
Interdisciplinary Network on Rural Population Health and AgingR24AG065159 · NIA · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI JENSEN, LEIF · 2019 to 2023
$1.9M
NIA NIH HHS R24 AG065159NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD041025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Growing evidence shows a relationship between social infrastructure (SI) - the physical places where people gather outside of home and work - and health. However, existing data sources for rigorously investigating this relationship are limited, especially for rural areas. Therefore, we conducted an environmental scan of existing data for furthering research on this topic, with a focus on the rural United States (U.S.). A total of 10 datasets met inclusion criteria. Key information was collated from websites and reviewed by data administrators. We summarize key features of these datasets, including available measures of geography/rurality, SI availability and utilization, and physical, mental and social health. We describe analytic strengths and weaknesses of the available data, which is essential for researchers to be able to assess their data options. While the scan focuses on U.S.-based data, the key points will be applicable more broadly, including a need for more data on availability and use of social infrastructure combined with geographic indicators.

Indexed as

HealthRuralSocial infrastructure

Identifiers

PMID39450319
PMCPMC11500698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.