Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39450311›Full record

ArticleNAR genomics and bioinformatics2024

The next-generation sequencing-chess problem.

Leo Zeitler, Arach Goldar, Cyril Denby Wilkes, Julie Soutourina

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NAR genomics and bioinformatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Leo ZeitlerInstitut Pasteur, Université Paris Cité, CNRS UMR 3525, INSERM UA12, Comparative Functional Genomics Group, Paris, 75015, France.
Arach GoldarUniversité Paris-Saclay, CEA, CNRS, Institute for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), 91198 Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Cyril Denby WilkesUniversité Paris-Saclay, CEA, CNRS, Institute for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), 91198 Gif-sur-Yvette, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3932-5294
Julie SoutourinaUniversité Paris-Saclay, CEA, CNRS, Institute for Integrative Biology of the Cell (I2BC), 91198 Gif-sur-Yvette, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5218-2350

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies paved the way for studying the spatiotemporal coordination of cellular processes along the genome. However, data sets are commonly limited to a few time points, and missing information needs to be interpolated. Most models assume that the studied dynamics are similar between individual cells, so that a homogeneous cell culture can be represented by a population-wide average. Here, we demonstrate that this understanding can be inappropriate. We developed a thought experiment-which we call the NGS chess problem-in which we compare the temporal sequencing data analysis to observing a superimposed picture of many independent games of chess at a time. The analysis of the spatiotemporal kinetics advocates for a new methodology that considers DNA-particle interactions in each cell independently even for a homogeneous cell population.

Identifiers

PMID39450311
PMCPMC11500447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.