ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024
A comparison of the effects of lung protective ventilation and conventional ventilation on the occurrence of atelectasis during laparoscopic surgery in young infants: a randomized controlled trial.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of lung protective ventilation and conventional ventilation on postoperative atelectasis in neonates under general anesthesia.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Trial
- Optimizing perioperative lung protection strategies for reducing postoperative respiratory complications in pediatric patients: a narrative review.Translational pediatrics · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study utilized lung ultrasound to investigate whether lung protective ventilation reduces pulmonary atelectasis and improves intraoperative oxygenation in infants undergoing laparoscopic surgery. Methods: Eighty young infants (aged 1-6 months) who received general anesthesia for more than 2 h during laparoscopic surgery were randomized into the lung protective ventilation group (LPV group) and the conventional ventilation group (control group). The LPV group received mechanical ventilation starting at 6 mL/kg tidal volume, 5 cmH Results: Statistically significant differences were observed in pulmonary atelectasis incidence, lung ultrasound scores, and the PaO Conclusion: In infants aged 1-6 months, lung protective ventilation during laparoscopy under general anesthesia significantly reduced the incidence of pulmonary atelectasis and enhanced intraoperative oxygenation and dynamic lung compliance compared to conventional ventilation. However, these benefits did not persist; no differences were observed in lung ultrasound scores or the incidence of pulmonary atelectasis at PACU discharge. Clinical trial registration: http://www.chictr.org.cn/, identifier: ChiCTR2200058653.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.