Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39450051›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in aging neuroscience2024

Machine learning models for diagnosing Alzheimer's disease using brain cortical complexity.

Shaofan Jiang, Siyu Yang, Kaiji Deng, Rifeng Jiang, Yunjing Xue

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shaofan Jiang *Department of Radiology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Siyu Yang *Department of Neurology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Kaiji DengDepartment of Radiology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Rifeng Jiang *Department of Radiology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.
Yunjing Xue *Department of Radiology, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to develop and validate machine learning models (MLMs) to diagnose Alzheimer's disease (AD) using cortical complexity indicated by fractal dimension (FD). Methods: A total of 296 participants with normal cognitive (NC) function and 182 with AD from the AD Neuroimaging Initiative database were randomly divided into training and internal validation cohorts. Then, FDs, demographic characteristics, baseline global cognitive function scales [Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ), Global Deterioration Scale (GDS), Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI)], phospho-tau (p-tau 181), amyloidβ-42/40, apolipoprotein E (APOE) and polygenic hazard score (PHS) were collected to establish multiple MLMs. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to evaluate model performance. Participants from our institution ( Results: The FDs from 30 out of 69 regions showed significant alteration. All MLMs were conducted based on the 30 significantly different FDs. The FD model had good accuracy in predicting AD in three cohorts [area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) = 0.842, 0.808, and 0.803]. There were no statistically significant differences in AUC values between the FD model and the other combined models in the training and internal validation cohorts except MoCA + FD and FAQ + FD models. Among MLMs, the MoCA + FD model showed the best predictive efficiency in three cohorts (AUC = 0.951, 0.931, and 0.955) and had the highest clinical net benefit. Conclusion: The FD model showed favorable diagnostic performance for AD. Among MLMs, the MoCA + FD model can predict AD with the highest efficiency and could be used as a non-invasive diagnostic method.

Indexed as

Alzheimer’s diseaseapolipoprotein Emachine learningmagnetic resonance imagingMontreal Cognitive Assessment

Identifiers

PMID39450051
PMCPMC11500324

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.