Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39450039›Full record

ReviewMedical science educator2024

Evidence-Based Crossword Puzzles for Health Professions Education: A Systematic Review.

Matthew Arnold, Sheryn Tan, Tiani Pakos, Brandon Stretton, Joshua Kovoor, Aashray Gupta, Josephine Thomas, Stephen Bacchi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medical science educator, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Matthew ArnoldUniversity of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005 Australia.ORCID 0009-0005-9510-0948
Sheryn TanUniversity of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005 Australia.
Tiani PakosRoyal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA 5000 Australia.
Brandon StrettonUniversity of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005 Australia.
Joshua KovoorUniversity of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005 Australia.
Aashray GuptaUniversity of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005 Australia.
Josephine ThomasUniversity of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005 Australia.
Stephen BacchiFlinders University, Bedford Park, SA 5042 Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Crossword puzzles have been utilised as a means of health professions education (HPE) gamification. A systematic review conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines was performed to evaluate the educational impact and describe the characteristics of crosswords in HPE contexts. Twenty-nine studies fulfilled inclusion criteria. Crossword puzzles are an enjoyable learning activity and provide positive educational impact. The available evidence suggests crossword puzzles increase student knowledge on objective measures. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40670-024-02085-x.

Indexed as

engagementenjoymentGamificationmedical education

Identifiers

PMID39450039
PMCPMC11496409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.