ReviewMedical science educator2024
Technologies for Studying and Teaching Human Anatomy: Implications in Academic Education.
Review in Medical science educator, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessment of classification accuracy in endodontics by dental students: a comparative study of holographic imaging and conventional radiography.BMC medical education · 2026Trial
- Visualizing Anatomy: Comparing the Pedagogical Impact of Chalkboard Teaching and 3D Models.Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- Untold stories of digital transformation in medical education: AI overdependence and nomophobia among medical students.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- A global overview of anatomical science education and its present and future role in biomedical curricula.Anatomical sciences education · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The teaching of human anatomy (HA) constitutes one of the fundamental pillars of the curriculum in biological and healthcare-related programs. Therefore, it is imperative that the methodology and didactics employed in this discipline equip students in the best possible way. The traditional method of teaching HA involves lectures and practical classes with previously dissected cadaveric specimens and dissection activities. Concurrently, the present era is witnessing the emergence and popularization of new digital technologies connected to the internet, among which we can highlight smartphones, quick response codes, and virtual reality devices, along with the dissemination of complementary imaging methods, such as radiography, ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging, and computerized tomography. From this perspective, the objective of this review is to analyze how each of these new tools integrates into the academic context, in order to diversify the teaching of HA and contribute to better understanding of the HA content during academic training, as well as the clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.