ReviewMedical science educator2024
Enablers of and Barriers to Self-Regulated and Self-Directed Aptitudes of Learning (SELF-ReDiAL) in Health Professional Education: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Review in Medical science educator, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- General Practitioner Engagement with Continuing Professional Development: A Scoping Review Protocol.Journal of CME · 2026Article
- Development and Validation of a Tool for Evaluating Self-regulated and Self-directed Aptitudes of Learning (SELF-ReDiAL).Medical science educator · 2025Article
- Readiness for self-directed learning among undergraduate medical students in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa during COVID-19, Pakistan.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Fostering professionalism among health professionals: the essential role of self-regulated and self-directed aptitudes of learning.Korean journal of medical education · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Recently, accrediting organizations have focused on developing lifelong learners who possess self-regulated and self-directed aptitudes of learning (hereinafter SELF-ReDiAL or in short, SR). This meta-analysis aimed to identify factors which promote or deter SR in health professionals. Methods: Original studies which, by using self-reports, evaluated enablers of and barriers to SR in health professionals (dentistry, medicine, nursing, and pharmacology), and were indexed in Scopus Results: From 149 identified papers, 43 studies were subsequently included in the meta-analysis. The strongest effect was generated by wellbeing ( Conclusions: Considering that student wellbeing had the strongest observed effect on SR, policy-setting and governing bodies should incorporate methods which improve wellbeing to develop health professionals with high levels of SR. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40670-024-02068-y.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.