Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39449985›Full record

ArticleQueueing systems2024

Applying queueing theory to evaluate wait-time-savings of triage algorithms.

Yee Lam Elim Thompson, Gary M Levine, Weijie Chen, Berkman Sahiner, Qin Li, Nicholas Petrick, Jana G Delfino, Miguel A Lago, Qian Cao, Frank W Samuelson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Queueing systems, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yee Lam Elim ThompsonThe U.S. Food and Drug Administration, White Oak, MD USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9653-7707
Gary M LevineThe U.S. Food and Drug Administration, White Oak, MD USA.
Weijie ChenThe U.S. Food and Drug Administration, White Oak, MD USA.
Berkman SahinerThe U.S. Food and Drug Administration, White Oak, MD USA.
Qin LiThe U.S. Food and Drug Administration, White Oak, MD USA.
Nicholas PetrickThe U.S. Food and Drug Administration, White Oak, MD USA.
Jana G DelfinoThe U.S. Food and Drug Administration, White Oak, MD USA.
Miguel A LagoThe U.S. Food and Drug Administration, White Oak, MD USA.
Qian CaoThe U.S. Food and Drug Administration, White Oak, MD USA.
Frank W SamuelsonThe U.S. Food and Drug Administration, White Oak, MD USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the past decade, artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms have made promising impacts in many areas of healthcare. One application is AI-enabled prioritization software known as computer-aided triage and notification (CADt). This type of software as a medical device is intended to prioritize reviews of radiological images with time-sensitive findings, thus shortening the waiting time for patients with these findings. While many CADt devices have been deployed into clinical workflows and have been shown to improve patient treatment and clinical outcomes, quantitative methods to evaluate the wait-time-savings from their deployment are not yet available. In this paper, we apply queueing theory methods to evaluate the wait-time-savings of a CADt by calculating the average waiting time per patient image without and with a CADt device being deployed. We study two workflow models with one or multiple radiologists (servers) for a range of AI diagnostic performances, radiologist's reading rates, and patient image (customer) arrival rates. To evaluate the time-saving performance of a CADt, we use the difference in the mean waiting time between the diseased patient images in the with-CADt scenario and that in the without-CADt scenario as our performance metric. As part of this effort, we have developed and also share a software tool to simulate the radiology workflow around medical image interpretation, to verify theoretical results, and to provide confidence intervals for the performance metric we defined. We show quantitatively that a CADt triage device is more effective in a busy, short-staffed reading setting, which is consistent with our clinical intuition and simulation results. Although this work is motivated by the need for evaluating CADt devices, the evaluation methodology presented in this paper can be applied to assess the time-saving performance of other types of algorithms that prioritize a subset of customers based on binary outputs.

Identifiers

PMID39449985
PMCPMC11496365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.