ArticleInternational journal of telemedicine and applications2024
Ensemble Classification Model With CFS-IGWO-Based Feature Selection for Cancer Detection Using Microarray Data.
Article in International journal of telemedicine and applications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cancer is the top cause of death worldwide, and machine learning (ML) has made an indelible mark on the field of early cancer detection, thereby lowering the death toll. ML-based model for cancer diagnosis is done using two forms of data: gene expression data and microarray data. The data on gene expression levels includes many dimensions. When dealing with data with a high dimension, the efficiency of an ML-based model is decreased. Microarray data is distinguished by its high dimensionality with a greater number of features and a smaller sample size. In this work, two ensemble techniques are proposed using majority voting technique and weighted average technique. Correlation feature selection (CFS) is used for feature selection, and improved grey wolf optimizer (IGWO) is used for feature optimization. Support vector machines (SVMs), multilayer perceptron (MLP) classification, logistic regression (LR), decision tree (DT), adaptive boosting (AdaBoost) classifier, extreme learning machines (ELMs), and K-nearest neighbor (KNN) are used as classifiers. The results of each distinct base learner were then combined using weighted average and majority voting ensemble methods. Accuracy (ACC), specificity (SPE), sensitivity (SEN), precision (PRE), Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC), and F1-score (F1-S) are used to assess the performance. Our result shows that majority voting achieves better performance than the weighted average ensemble technique.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.