Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39449954›Full record

ReviewCureus2024

Exploring the Long-Term Effect of Artificial Sweeteners on Metabolic Health.

Meenatchi M, Chitra Vellapandian

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Macronutrients as Regulators of Intestinal Epithelial Permeability: Where Do We Stand?Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Meenatchi MDepartment of Pharmacology, Sri Ramaswamy Memorial (SRM) College of Pharmacy, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur, IND.
Chitra VellapandianDepartment of Pharmacology, Sri Ramaswamy Memorial (SRM) College of Pharmacy, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Artificial sweeteners (ASs) are widely used as low-calorie sugar substitutes for managing conditions like diabetes and obesity, but recent evidence suggests their health effects may be more complex than previously understood. High consumption has been associated with increased risks of metabolic disorders, cardiovascular diseases, certain cancers, and, somewhat paradoxically, weight gain, adverse pregnancy outcomes, and potential risks for individuals with low seizure thresholds. Studies, including the Women's Health Initiative, have linked artificially sweetened beverages to an elevated risk of stroke, coronary heart disease, and mortality, independent of established risk factors. Concerns extend to gut health, where ASs like saccharin have been linked to inflammatory bowel diseases, gut microbiota disruption, increased intestinal permeability, and dysbiosis, leading to metabolic disturbances such as impaired glucose tolerance, insulin resistance, and heightened systemic inflammation. These disruptions reduce the production of short-chain fatty acids crucial for insulin sensitivity, further contributing to the development of metabolic disorders like type 2 diabetes mellitus. Given these potential health risks, this review underscores the need for cautious use, informed consumer choices, and stringent regulatory oversight, while emphasizing the necessity for further research to elucidate long-term health effects and develop strategies to mitigate these risks.

Indexed as

artificial sweetenersdysbiosishealth risksmetabolicobesitytype 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID39449954
PMCPMC11501561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.