Oral Liposomal Iron Versus Injectable Iron Sucrose for Anemia Treatment in Non-dialysis Chronic Kidney Disease Patients: A Non-inferiority Study.

Introduction Anemia is a prevalent and persistent complication in chronic kidney disease (CKD), particularly in advanced stages, contributing to the deterioration of renal function and diminishing patients' quality of life. Iron supplementation constitutes a cornerstone of anemia management in this population. Among various iron formulations, liposomal iron has emerged as a promising option due to its enhanced efficacy in replenishing iron reserves and improved tolerability. Objective This study aims to assess the comparative effects of intravenous and liposomal oral iron on hemoglobin levels in non-dialysis CKD patients. Additionally, it seeks to evaluate the rate of hemoglobin correction, iron reserve status during treatment, and therapeutic tolerance to these interventions. Materials and methods A randomized controlled trial enrolled CKD patients (stages 3-5, not on dialysis) with iron deficiency anemia (hemoglobin ≤ 12 g/dL, ferritin ≤ 100 ng/mL, transferrin saturation ≤ 25%). Participants were allocated to receive either daily oral liposomal iron (Group OS) at a dosage of 30 mg or intravenous iron-hydroxide sucrose complex weekly (Group IV) for three months. Follow-up extended through the treatment phase and two months post-withdrawal. Results Thirty-one CKD patients were randomized into two groups: 14 received intravenous iron (IV group) and 17 received oral iron (OS group). After excluding four patients, the final cohort comprised 27 individuals (IV group: n=13, OS group: n=14). Both iron treatments resulted in progressive hemoglobin increases, with the IV group showing a mean increase of 14.65% (p=0.049) compared to 4.78% (p=0.003) in the OS group. Secondary analysis revealed significant increases in ferritin levels (p<0.001) and transferrin saturation (TSAT) levels (p=0.031) in the IV group. Post-treatment follow-up demonstrated stable hemoglobin levels in the OS group and a consistent increase in ferritin levels in the IV group. Adverse reactions predominantly included hypotension in the IV group (4 (30.7%)) and constipation in the OS group (4 (28.4%)). Discussion and conclusion Anemia remains a significant challenge in CKD patients. Our study compares oral liposomal iron to injectable iron for anemia treatment, aiming to minimize hospitalizations for iron infusion, preserve venous capital, and mitigate potential harmful side effects. We found oral liposomal iron to be a safe and effective option for correcting anemia in non-dialysis CKD patients, albeit with lower efficacy in replenishing iron stores compared to IV iron. Comparative analysis with similar studies supports the non-inferiority of oral liposomal iron, although IV iron retains superiority in replenishing iron reserves.