ReviewCureus2024
Efficacy of pCONUS Devices in the Management of Intracranial Aneurysms: Outcomes of 190 Patients.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intracranial aneurysms (IAs) pose a significant health concern, necessitating effective treatment modalities. The pCONUS device has emerged as a promising option for managing complex IAs, particularly wide-necked bifurcation aneurysms. Evaluating its efficacy across multiple studies is essential for establishing therapeutic guidelines. A systematic review was conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to identify studies assessing the efficacy of pCONUS devices in treating cerebral aneurysms. PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus were searched for relevant articles published from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2021. Inclusion criteria encompassed clinical trials examining pCONUS device benefits for ruptured or unruptured cerebral aneurysms. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed independently by two reviewers. Out of 390 initially identified articles, eight studies met the inclusion criteria. These studies collectively involved 190 participants with intracranial aneurysms. The sample sizes ranged from seven to 40 patients, predominantly in retrospective designs. Complete occlusion rates varied from 46.8% to 100%, with a mean diameter of treated aneurysms ranging from 2.5 mm to 8.83 mm. This systematic review suggests that pCONUS devices are feasible and effective for treating complex bifurcation cerebral aneurysms, with acceptable complication rates. Despite limitations such as retrospective study designs and limited follow-up durations, the findings support the beneficial role of pCONUS devices in managing challenging intracranial aneurysms. Larger collaborative efforts with longer follow-up durations are warranted to validate these findings and establish wider therapeutic guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.