ArticleCureus2024
Successful Combination Therapy of Optic Canal Decompression and Steroid Administration for Traumatic Optic Neuropathy in a 10-Year-Old Boy.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traumatic optic neuropathy (TON) is a rare complication caused by head injury in children. TON treatment has employed conservative treatment, steroid administration, and surgical procedures; however, which treatment is preferable remains controversial. We herein present a case of a 10-year-old boy with a TON-complicated head injury after falling from a two-meter-high slide in a park. Initial head computed tomography (CT) revealed the right optic canal fracture, and the patient complained of right visual impairment. He was diagnosed with TON, and surgical right optic canal decompression was performed at six hours post-injury. On postoperative day 2, his right visual acuity (VA) was 20/200, and his right eye developed a relative afferent pupillary defect, prompting a high-dose prednisolone administration. On day 12 post-injury, his right VA improved to 20/30. This clinical course suggests that a combined approach of optic canal decompression and steroid therapy was effective in this case. Further investigation is needed to identify optimal treatments that contribute to favorable visual outcomes for TON management in children. However, in pediatric patients, aggressive treatment may be warranted to prevent permanent visual impairment, with decisions made based on individual background factors and neurological symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.