ReviewDigital health
Explainable machine learning for modeling predictors of unintended pregnancy among married/in-union women in sub-Saharan Africa, a multi-country analysis of MICS 6 survey.
Review in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Unintended pregnancy is defined as a pregnancy that is either mistimed (wanted at a later time) or unwanted (not wanted at all). It has been a concerning issue for reproductive health and public health, with significant negative effects on the mother, child, and the public at large. It is a worldwide public health issue that can have a major impact on the health of pregnant women and newborns. Methods: The study was conducted using secondary data from IPUMS Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys round 6. The analysis was based on a data merged from six sub-Saharan Africa countries such as Gambia, Ghana, Lesotho, Malawi, Nigeria, and Sierra Leone. A total weighted sample of 28,027married/in-union reproductive-age women was included in the study. Seven machine learning algorithms were trained and their performance compared in predicting unintended pregnancy. Finally, Shapley Additive exPlanations model explanation technique was used to identify the predictors of unintended pregnancy. Results: XGBoost was the top-performing model, achieved the highest area under receiver operating characteristic curve (0.62) and accuracy (65.92%), surpassing all other models. SHAP global feature importance identified top predictors of unintended pregnancy, with women from Malawi, Ghana, and Lesotho, women having primary education and secondary education, with parity of more than three, have higher likelihood of unintended pregnancy. In the other hand, women from Nigeria and Sierra Leone, whose husband/partner has more wives or partners (polygamy relation), and women who owns mobile phone had lower risk of unintended pregnancy. Conclusion: These findings highlight the importance of considering contextual factors, such as country-specific sociocultural norms and individual characteristics, in understanding and addressing unintended pregnancies. By strategically addressing the identified predictors, policymakers, and healthcare providers can develop impactful programs that address the root causes of unintended pregnancies, ultimately contributing to improved reproductive health outcomes worldwide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.