Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39449835›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of anaesthesia2024

Thoracic spinal anaesthesia - An effective alternative to general anaesthesia in breast surgeries: A randomised, non-blinded study.

G S Karthik, Rangalakshmi Srinivasan, R Sudheer, M Amabareesha, T S Monisha, M Dilip Kumar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of anaesthesia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

G S KarthikDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Rajarajeswari Medical College and Hospital, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5102-1133
Rangalakshmi SrinivasanDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Rajarajeswari Medical College and Hospital, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0051-4266
R SudheerDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Rajarajeswari Medical College and Hospital, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8706-7712
M AmabareeshaDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Rajarajeswari Medical College and Hospital, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3868-8472
T S MonishaDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Rajarajeswari Medical College and Hospital, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0603-096X
M Dilip KumarDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Rajarajeswari Medical College and Hospital, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-1154-7420

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: General anaesthesia (GA) is the preferred modality for breast surgeries; however, neuraxial anaesthesia can be performed in cases where GA poses a significant risk. We hypothesise that neuraxial blockade is a safe and effective alternative to GA in short-duration breast surgeries. Methods: This randomised study included 30 patients of the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I and II, who were scheduled for elective breast surgeries of a duration of less than 90 min. Group I received thoracic spinal anaesthesia, while in Group II, standardised GA was administered. The primary outcome was the time to the first rescue analgesic, and the secondary outcomes were time to recovery, patient satisfaction and the cost incurred. Results: The demographic characteristics of both groups were comparable ( Conclusion: Thoracic spinal anaesthesia is an excellent alternative to GA in terms of analgesic efficacy, patient satisfaction, recovery and cost-effectiveness for short-duration breast surgeries.

Indexed as

Anaesthesiabreast surgerycost-effectivenessgeneral anaesthesiaspinal blocksubarachnoid blockthoracic spinal anaesthesia

Identifiers

PMID39449835
PMCPMC11498257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.