ArticleFrontiers in transplantation2024
Single center experience with ABO-incompatible and ABO-compatible pediatric heart transplantation.
Article in Frontiers in transplantation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The impact of pre-transplant ventricular assist device support in pediatric patients with end-stage heart failure on the outcomes of heart transplantation-"a single center experience".Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The aim of this study was to analyze the results after pediatric heart transplantation (pHTx) at our single center differentiating between ABO-incompatible (ABOi) and -compatible (ABOc) procedures. Methods and patients: We retrospectively analyzed outcomes of ABO-incompatible HTx procedures performed at our center and compared the data to ABO-compatible HTx of the same era. Eighteen children (<17 months) underwent pediatric HTx and seven of them underwent ABO-incompatible HTx between 2003 and 2015. Results: Mechanical circulatory support as bridge to transplant was necessary in 3/7 patients before ABO-incompatible HTx and in 3/11 patients before ABO-compatible HTx. Mean waiting time on the list was 36 ± 30 days for ABO-incompatible HTx and 86 ± 65 days for ABO-compatible HTx. The 5-years re-transplant free survival was 86% following ABO-incompatible and 91% after ABO-compatible. In the cohort undergoing ABO-incompatible HTx, 2 patients showed an acute cellular rejection, while early graft failure was not observed. In the cohort undergoing ABOcompatible HTx, acute cellular rejection was observed in 9/11 patients, with early graft failure occurring in nine and CVP in two. A total of ten children were listed for ABO-incompatible HTx after 2015; however, all ten underwent an ABO-compatible transplantation. Discussion: This study adds much needed information to the literature on ABOi-HTx by showing with a retrospective single center analysis that it is safe and leads to shorter waiting times. We conclude that strategies for ABOi-HTx should be elaborated further, potentially allowing more timely transplantation and thereby preventing waiting list complications such as the need for mechanical circulatory support and even death.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.