ArticleHeliyon2024
The construction of the index system for nurses' innovation competence evaluation in China: A Delphi study.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Developing a Traditional Chinese Medicine-Based Lifestyle Content Framework for Insomnia: A Modified Delphi Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The impact of innovativeness on Chinese nurses' attitudes toward artificial intelligence: a cross-sectional study based on the technology acceptance model.BMC nursing · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Scientific and technological innovation has become the "key variable" of national social and economic development. Nurses' innovation ability can improve the quality of patient care, thus shorten the hospital stay, reduce the medical costs, and promote the rapid development of the nursing industry. Nowadays nurses have gradually involved in various innovation, but less concerns are focus on the evaluation of nurse's innovation competence. Objective: To develop evaluation index system for nurse's innovation competence. Participants: Eleven experts with innovation experience from different regions in China. Methods: Literature review and qualitative interview were used to establish first version of index system. Then, a two-round Delphi expert consultation was conducted to collect opinions from 11 experts. Then the final version of nurses' innovation competence evaluation index was used in one tertiary hospital for preliminary application. Results: The response rate of the two rounds was more than 90%, the expert familiarity coefficient was 0.818, the judgment coefficient was 0.918, and the authority coefficient was 0.868. The two rounds of expert coordination coefficient test showed P < 0.05. The evaluation index system of nurses' innovation competence includes 4 first-level indicators, 9 second-level indicators and 36 third-level indicators. The scores of innovation production and innovation subject were the lowest among all the first-level indicators when use this index for preliminary application. Conclusion: The constructed evaluation index system of nurses' innovation competence are scientific, reliable and practical, and can be used to promote nurse's innovation competence and innovation conversion competence in clinical practice. Hospital managers should pay more attention on cultivate nurse's innovation competence and provide resources and multi-form platforms to support the nurses with innovative ideas and willingness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.