Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39449642›Full record

ArticleScience progress

Low-carbon generation for the restoration of our ecosystems: Technology, strategy, and policy - Editorial.

Hongbo Duan, Jiali Zheng, Shouyang Wang

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Science progress. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hongbo DuanSchool of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, P.R. China.ORCID 0000-0001-5143-4413
Jiali ZhengSchool of Management, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, P.R. China.
Shouyang WangSchool of Economics and Management, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, P.R. China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The article identifies key principles of the important role played by low-carbon generation for ecosystems, which explores studies from perspectives of technology, strategy, and policy. In doing so, it provides a scientific basis for policymakers to formulate efficient and feasible plans to reduce emissions via low-carbon generation to revive ecosystems. Various situations are designed for the development path of low-carbon power generation via adaptive and systematic policies with advanced technologies and appropriate strategies. The article goes on to introduce and discuss a collection of papers that explore the restoration of ecosystem by low-carbon power generation. They discuss how to use technology to optimize low-carbon power generation system, analyze the impact of policies on low-carbon power generation, and explain the mechanism of strategies on low-carbon development of ecosystems.

Indexed as

Low-carbon generationpolicyrestoration of ecosystemsstrategytechnology

Identifiers

PMID39449642
PMCPMC11514118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.