ArticleSe pu = Chinese journal of chromatography2024
[Determination of seven phenoxy carboxylic acid herbicides in water using dispersive solid phase extraction coupled with ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry based on metal-organic framework composite aerogel].
Article in Se pu = Chinese journal of chromatography, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Phenoxy carboxylic acid herbicides (PCAs) are difficult to degrade and, thus, pose significant threats to the environment and human health. The limit for 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid is 30 μg/L in China's standards for drinking water quality, 70 μg/L in the United States' drinking water standards, and 30 μg/L in the World Health Organization's guidelines for drinking water quality. Therefore, the development of an effective detection method for trace PCAs in water is a crucial endeavor. Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are novel porous materials that possess advantages such as a large specific surface area, adjustable pore size, and abundant active sites. They exhibit excellent adsorption capability for various compounds. However, the applications of MOFs as adsorbents are limited. For example, the process of isolating powdered MOFs from aqueous solutions is laborious, and microporous MOFs exhibit limited surface affinity, which decreases their mass transfer efficiency in the liquid phase. MOF crystals can be embedded in a substrate to overcome these limitations. Aerogels are obtained by drying hydrogels, which are hydrophilic polymers with a three-dimensional crosslinked network structure. Spongy aerogel materials exhibit unique structural properties such as high porosity, large pore volume, ultralow density, and easy tailorability. When MOFs are combined with an aerogel, their efficient and selective adsorption properties are preserved. In addition, MOF aerogels exhibit a hierarchical porous structure, which enhances the affinity and mass transfer efficiency of the MOF for target molecules. At present, MOF aerogels are primarily prepared by freeze-drying or using supercritical carbon dioxide. These drying processes require significant amounts of energy and time. Hence, the development of greener and more efficient methods to prepare skeleton aerogels is urgently needed. In this study, we prepared an environment-friendly aerogel at ambient temperature and pressure without the use of specialized drying equipment. This ambient-dried MOF composite aerogel was then used for the dispersive solid phase extraction (DSPE) of seven PCAs from environmental water, followed by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS). The key parameters affecting the efficiency of DSPE, including the extraction conditions, ratio of MIL-101(Fe)-NH
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.