Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39449443›Full record

ReviewNursing reports (Pavia, Italy)2024

Measuring Instruments for Media Health Literacy: A Systematic Review of Psychometric Properties.

Noelia Navas-Echazarreta, Raúl Juárez-Vela, Antonio Martínez-Sabater, Emmanuel Echániz-Serrano, María Teresa Fernández-Rodrigo, Olga Navarro-Martínez, Consuelo Sancho-Sánchez, Ana Cobos-Rincón, Antonio Rodríguez-Calvo, Silvia González-Fernández and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nursing reports (Pavia, Italy), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Noelia Navas-EchazarretaDoctoral Program in Health Sciences and Sports, University of Zaragoza, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-0804-5209
Raúl Juárez-VelaGRUPAC Research Group, Department of Nursing, University of La Rioja, 26006 Logroño, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3597-2048
Antonio Martínez-SabaterFaculty of Nursing, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6440-1431
Emmanuel Echániz-SerranoMedia Literacy in Health Group (GRUPAMES)-Innovation and Training in Educational Sciences Research Center (CIFICE), University of Zaragoza, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4753-630X
María Teresa Fernández-RodrigoMedia Literacy in Health Group (GRUPAMES)-Innovation and Training in Educational Sciences Research Center (CIFICE), University of Zaragoza, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6455-119X
Olga Navarro-MartínezFaculty of Nursing, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3563-4129
Consuelo Sancho-SánchezFaculty of Medicine, University of Salamanca, 37007 Salamanca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-5236-8016
Ana Cobos-RincónGRUPAC Research Group, Department of Nursing, University of La Rioja, 26006 Logroño, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4121-8992
Antonio Rodríguez-CalvoHospital Universitario de Salamanca, 37007 Salamanca, Spain.
Silvia González-FernándezFaculty of Medicine, University of Salamanca, 37007 Salamanca, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4857-1665
Elena Chover-SierraFaculty of Nursing, University of Valencia, 46010 Valencia, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4141-6956
Pedro José Satústegui-DordáMedia Literacy in Health Group (GRUPAMES)-Innovation and Training in Educational Sciences Research Center (CIFICE), University of Zaragoza, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0083-5940

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background

methodsA systematic review of the scientific literature was performed in 2023. The articles were extracted from the electronic databases "Pubmed", "Web of Science", "Dialnet", and "Scopus". The search languages were limited to English, Spanish, and Portuguese.

resultsTwelve articles were selected for further analysis. The described measurement instruments included five original scales and seven cross-cultural adaptations of three of them. Four scales (the Sugar-Sweetened Beverages Media Literacy scale adapted to Turkish and Chinese, along with the Media Health Literacy (MeHLit) scale and its adaptation to the Chinese language) exhibited high quality in the assessment of psychometric properties.

conclusionsThese instruments allow for the measurement of an individual's level of skill when consuming specific health information, enabling an analysis to understand the risk they are exposed to. Further research is recommended to strengthen the existing evidence and apply these tools to broader and more diverse populations.

Indexed as

healthinstrumentmedia health literacyscalesystematic review

Identifiers

PMID39449443
PMCPMC11503266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.