ReviewInternational journal of neonatal screening2024
A Systematic Literature Review on the Global Status of Newborn Screening for Mucopolysaccharidosis II.
Review in International journal of neonatal screening, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Longitudinal Assessment of Cognitive Development in 23 Patients With Mucopolysaccharidosis (MPS) Type II: Results of up to 14 Years of Follow-Up.Journal of inherited metabolic disease · 2026Article
- A North Carolina newborn screening pilot for mucopolysaccharidosis II: Evaluating endogenous nonreducing end glycosaminoglycan analysis and IDS sequencing as higher-tier testing options.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2026Article
- Combined Intracerebroventricular Enzyme Replacement and Cord Blood Transplantation in Patients with Mucopolysaccharidosis Type II Diagnosed Through Newborn Screening.International journal of neonatal screening · 2026Article
- Natural history, clinical symptoms, and cognitive development of Japanese patients with mucopolysaccharidosis III.Molecular genetics and metabolism reports · 2025Article
- Japanese experience of newborn screening for lysosomal storage diseases and adrenoleukodystrophy.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A systematic literature review was conducted to determine the global status of newborn screening (NBS) for mucopolysaccharidosis (MPS) II (Hunter syndrome; OMIM 309900). Electronic databases were searched in July 2023 for articles referencing NBS for lysosomal storage diseases: 53 featured MPS II. Until recently, only Taiwan and two US states (Illinois and Missouri) formally screened newborns for MPS II, although pilot programs have been conducted elsewhere (Japan, New York, and Washington). In 2022, MPS II was added to the US Recommended Uniform Screening Panel, with increased uptake of NBS anticipated across the USA. While the overall MPS II birth prevalence, determined from NBS initiatives, was higher than in previous reports, it was lower in the USA (approximately 1 in 73,000 according to recent studies in Illinois and Missouri) than in Asia (approximately 1 in 15,000 in Japan). NBS programs typically rely on tandem mass spectrometry quantification of iduronate-2-sulfatase activity for first-tier testing. Diagnosis is often confirmed via molecular genetic testing and/or biochemical testing but may be complicated by factors such as pseudodeficiency alleles and variants of unknown significance. Evidence relating to MPS II NBS is lacking outside Taiwan and the USA. Although broad benefits of NBS are recognized, few studies specifically explored the perspectives of families of children with MPS II.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.