ArticleCurrent medicinal chemistry2025
Machine Learning-based Macrophage Signature for Predicting Prognosis and Immunotherapy Benefits in Cholangiocarcinoma.
Article in Current medicinal chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Research hotspots and trends in immunotherapy for cholangiocarcinoma: a bibliometric analysis (2014-2023).Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsWe aimed to develop a macrophage signature for predicting clinical outcomes and immunotherapy benefits in cholangiocarcinoma.
backgroundMacrophages are potent immune effector cells that can change phenotype in different environments to exert anti-tumor and anti-tumor functions. The role of macrophages in the prognosis and therapy benefits of cholangiocarcinoma was not fully clarified.
objectiveThe objective of this study is to develop a prognostic model for cholangiocarcinoma.
methodsThe macrophage-related signature (MRS) was developed using 10 machine learning methods with TCGA, GSE89748 and GSE107943 datasets. Several indicators (TIDE score, TMB score and MATH score) and two immunotherapy datasets (IMvigor210 and GSE91061) were used to investigate the performance of MRS in predicting the benefits of immunotherapy.
resultsThe Lasso + CoxBoost method's MRS was considered a robust and stable model that demonstrated good accuracy in predicting the clinical outcome of patients with cholangiocarcinoma; the AUC of the 2-, 3-, and 4-year ROC curves in the TCGA dataset were 0.965, 0.957, and 1.000. Moreover, MRS acted as an independent risk factor for the clinical outcome of cholangiocarcinoma cases. Cholangiocarcinoma cases with higher MRS scores are correlated with a higher TIDE score, higher tumor escape score, higher MATH score, and lower TMB score. Further analysis suggested high MRS score indicated a higher gene set score correlated with cancer-related hallmarks.
conclusionWith regard to cholangiocarcinoma, the current study created a machine learning-based MRS that served as an indication for forecasting the prognosis and therapeutic advantages of individual cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39449334What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.